No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of providing aids to anonymous people. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely select that people nowdays are helpful and they are more ready than people in the past toward offering help to the others. It is my firm belief humans making good deeds easily in these days for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, with the rapid development of the world and the sophisticated technology, now the world is like a small village, so people can contact with enormous charities,associations, and indivisual people how make initiatives in the aim of provide help to poor people in all aspects of aids like commodites, clothes and cash money. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. My father is working with a charity which is collecting aids from people how are wealthy and provide poor people with these aids. On top of that, this corporation contact with donors by several methods like social media, phone calls or face by face. Most of these technologies were not available in the past, so it solved many problems and make this process wider and faster. If I had more time, I would have participated with these charities.
Secondly, increasing catastrophics like earthquackes or floods stimulate people feelings when they show these scenes on television or social media in comparison with the absence of these scenes in the past because of lacking of many of these technologies. Drawing from my own experience. Last week an earthquacke hit Turkey and Syria, so thousands of people dead and injured. Consequently, a lot of people start to provide help to these people from various countries without know them just because they want provide help to these unlucky people. However, people have high confidence with many firms that provide food and alternative home for the people in these countries. As a result, yesterday, thousands of people have new places to live with food just because of the help from the others.
In coclusion, I feel strongly that people nowdays are more adapted toward help others. This is because raising of technology which made everthing easier to access and the verified corporations that provide full picture to the donors.
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning w 73
- Although the sale of rhinoceros horns is illegal worldwide rhinoceroses Rhinos are commonly poached hunted illegally for their horns which can be sold for tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram Rhino horns are so valuable that one type of rhino is alre 73
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 90
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First the inc 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , associations
...ople can contact with enormous charities,associations, and indivisual people how make initiat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96708860759 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79213076909 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524050632911 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6092693002 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.411764706 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290626049682 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982569438345 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982072048559 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18557930249 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681973416834 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.