older friends vs new friends
We need to communicate with people, specifically with our friends; therefore, one of the highly controversial issues among many people is staying with your older friends vs. making new friends. As far as I am concerned, in a state of ambivalence, I might learn to be with my older friends. Ostensibly, some people believe that we should find new friends, because we will obtain new experiences talking to them and improve our social appearance, however, I can declare the higher beneficiary of keeping our older friends. I will interpret my response in the following essay.
First, we need strong relationships to enjoy our life. When one makes new friends, the knowledge regarding that person lacks in many aspects; data such as the behavior, family relationships, favorites, etc. can not be learned in a brief time. Granted all of this little information contributes to the strength of a relation, but short relation cannot provide them. As an illustrative example, when I was in high school, one of my old friends had an allergy to mango. My friend's new friend held a party for her birthday, serving a mango cake, not knowing about the possible-allergic reaction. Unfortunately, my friend ended up at the hospital, and it was her worst birthday, ever. My friend was not angry, given the explanation, but they never forget the incident. Therefore, to make strong relations, one needs much information about friends and information obtainment associate with the time.
Second, with a longer time to spend with a person, you share more memories. One cannot start talking about the shared childhood memories upon seeing a new person. Most of the time we talk about our memories with our friends; without such kind of memories, it would be hard to find a topic to make more memories. For example, some years ago, my sister invited her friend home to spend a night with her. That night they slept sooner than us, as they had nothing to talk about. So, to improve the relationship with someone one needs to share memories and therefore spend much time with that person.
Third, older friends tend to be more reliable. When we have problems, we prefer to consult with somebody known for a long time. This happens because we can rely on their honesty and help. For instance, when I have some academic problem and I need someone to consult, the first person I am thinking of is my oldest friend. Therefore, we need reliable friends, and most of the times they are our oldest friends.
I am of the conviction that the older friend is better; because we make strong bonds, have many shared memories and rely on them the most, but it would not harm to make new friends. So, I mainly suggest keeping our old friends, while making new friends occasionally. The effect of my solution would be that we have the benefits of our older companions while gaining new experience, but if not possible, for the aforementioned reasons, I conclude that a longer relationship, with an older friend, is a better choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-24 | ChelsyLan | 90 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | Andy_84 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | GeniusM | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2492.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85769980507 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74976677495 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469785575049 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7343712447 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3214285714 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.67857142857 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298787100166 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915443892762 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938671184272 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195008222582 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945121354118 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.