one can learn about a person by books and movies that person likes. Do you agree or disagree on this statement?
More often than not, we fall a circumstance of not having a proper friend or wrong association. As a result, we cannot stop tolerating the miseries of our life which above all disperses a bit of repentance. As a whole, we to judge a person is a must to sustain a congenial relationship among ourselves. In this case, identifying a person with the help of examining the books and movies that he likes is not the correct approach so long as I study. For sure, I will try with my might and main to hold up the inner exactness of my statement with specific reasons.
To embark on, a particular person has different fashion of choices, likes and dislikes which invariably are differential and cannot be related with the help of mathematics or scientific logic as we know human mind is the touchiness embodiment of philosophy. What I want to say by this is that to find out the main theme of a person’s inner quality is not only cumbersome but also quite improbable. From time immemorial till now, so many philosophers relentlessly tried with their best to get the gist psychology as tantamount as overall people and confined to this mammoth scenario within an equation. For example, Aristotle, Plato they enormously intervened a way so that they easily interpret the thinking which a man ponders over or what he wants to perform. But it is easy task to make out the internees of a social being. Rather they discovered that if it is tried, it will be the greatest foolishness of the world endeavors.
In addition, a man likes to read a book, watches movies. This information doe not mean necessarily that he is only accustomed to a particular book. Which is why I think only by knowing a person’s two or three habits is not an ideal way to discover himself. He may love to read a romantic book but sometimes he read thriller book. So, if we judge himself according to thriller book, proper judgement will not come. For instance, my bosom friend read different types of comic book, I know that from my first year. Undoubtably I can refer what types of comic he already finished, but when he expressed me that he just passed his time by reading book, I was discombobulated. So, to judge a person as a book is not a proper idea.
Furthermore, some movie he likes to discover a person holds up a misreporting concept. A person loves to watch thriller movie , it does not carry its whole characteristics . On the other hand if we consider that he is a movie-goer,it will be wrong decision as he just fill up his leisure via watching thriller movie. May be in most of time, he watches action movie. So to investigate a person via only movie or book is not an approachable one which I think. For example, my brother watch action movie and he loves his country. But after a period, I saw that he actually jingoism, so how we interpret it.
To wrap it up, though many person oppose my opinion, I wholeheartedly opine that by dint of a book or movie which a person likes is not a constructing system to figure out a person. Rather its consequences will be clear, if we keep close association with him.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-26 | MD. TOUKIR HASAN | 73 | view |
- coal power plant ash new regulation 83
- Today there is a lot of negative news on TV and social media. Some believe that it is a good idea to stop watching the news and take a break while others do not. What is your position? 73
- Students should learn a foreign language at the very beginning of their tender age. Do you agree or disagree with the topic? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different? 70
- one can learn about a person by books and movies that person likes. Do you agree or disagree on this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
.... As a whole, we to judge a person is a must to sustain a congenial relationship among ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 832, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ke out the internees of a social being. Rather they discovered that if it is tried, it...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... A person loves to watch thriller movie , it does not carry its whole characteris...
^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...does not carry its whole characteristics . On the other hand if we consider that h...
^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...d if we consider that he is a movie-goer,it will be wrong decision as he just fill ...
^^^
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...eisure via watching thriller movie. May be in most of time, he watches action movi...
^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'many people', 'many persons'.
Suggestion: many people; many persons
...we interpret it. To wrap it up, though many person oppose my opinion, I wholeheartedly opi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...tructing system to figure out a person. Rather its consequences will be clear, if we k...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 558.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55555555556 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88460905284 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496415770609 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.9 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8975309321 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7857142857 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207430718801 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064477318044 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681657257168 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132380970189 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373111230139 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.