One company plans to prohibit employees from working through emails and text messages during weekends and holidays. Some people believe that by doing this, the company can reduce employees’ dissatisfaction with the company; while others believe this does not work. What is your opinion and why?
Several companies plan to improve the productivity of workers in various ways. While some companies ban employees from working with emails and text messages during weekends and holidays, some consider that this plan does not work. It is so controvertible for them to decide a specific solution to decrease dissatisfaction with the company by workers. In my view, they should prohibit workers from using technologies in a day off for their work. Workers reduce stress from companies, focus on their hobbies, and attain more concentration on tasks in their companies.
To begin with, workers diminish stress from their companies to exclude finishing tasks in their homes. Ordinary employees often obtain concerns contained friendship with their fellows, hierarchy in workplaces, and competition between others about their companies. These bothers gradually limit the efficiency of the company. If they still work after going back to their home, they will concern about their company and their tasks outside of their workplace. It does not match up with the systems to increase the performance of companies. Therefore, they should select the plan that employees do not work at their home.
Secondly, hindering bountiful tasks from workers in their home provide enough time for them to spend their time hobbies. On weekends, people want to concentrate on their hobbies such as playing sports, reading books, and hanging out with their friends, and so on. These activities make workers forget about their thinking about their workplaces. Moreover, they polish their satisfaction with private life. Consequently, they decrease uncomfortable about their companies.
Finally, employees further focus on their tasks in their companies with the strategy to prevent using technologies in their homes. Without working additional works in their home, they deadly have to concentrate on their tasks in their workplace. They also consider how to improve performance to finish their jobs at exactly time and collaborate with others for goals about what they do not take assignments in their house. Hence, it causes each company to ease displeasure about their works and acquire the high quality of finishing their tasks. Thus, companies should impede that workers use electric devices in their homes.
To sum up, workplaces should decide to reduce the working time in the house for their employees. I surely believe that workers comfort their stress against their companies, again plenty of time of hobbies, and more convene on tasks in their companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-11 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
- Doing which activity do you think can better help you strengthen the friendship between you and your friend having a good time together with your friend solving your friend s problem with him or her 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school 73
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other to discuss and give opinions 80
- Which one do you think is important to long lasting friendship 1 Help you when you need 2 Share same interest and hobby 3 mutual trust 70
- Which of the following do you think is the best way for a student to make new friends join a sports team participating volunteer activities in a community traveling 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, such as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 15.1003584229 7% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42317380353 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66226713789 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496221662469 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1395628188 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6086956522 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2608695652 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188862841916 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802708099872 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105542226262 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138991387284 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123727060024 0.0645574589148 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.