At one high school, more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments. For example, many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments. The school is considering making a change to help decrease the number of students who cheat on homework. Which one of the following actions do you think will be most effective and why?
- asking parents to monitor their children as they do their homework and confirm that their children have not cheated.
Or
- increasing the penalty (punishment) for cheating.
Or
- asking teachers to create homework assignments that will make it more difficult for students to cheat.
The ultimate goal of education is leading people to a better life in which everyone adheres to the society’s principles. Not only the educational system teaches fundamental values through different grades of school but also looks for effective ways to refrain students from doing unacceptable behavior that is frowned upon. One of these moral scruples that a student must avoid is plagiarizing and cheating in doing their assignments. There are different ways to put halt to lifting others idea by students. In my opinion, the most appropriate way to prevent students from cheating is punishing them and giving them a penalty for their immoral behavior. By using this strategy, not only students learn responsibility in their school and future lives, but also they will be motivated to do their own assignment and study more.
To begin with, reprimanding a student teaches his that he is the only one who is responsible for breaking the rules. When a student knows that he is punished because he has not tried like other students, he accepts that the only way to advocate himself is using his knowledge and effort. For example, during my last exam, I had a tight schedule and I had many assignments to do. When I saw many students using each other’s ideas I used one of the classmates high score assignment. Eventually, when my teacher asked me about the method I used in solving the problem I could not advocate the idea because it was not mine. If I had tried before I could have supported my assignment. I got a low score on that exam, but I learned an excellent lesson: I can only take responsibility for my own work, not others. A student might chastise himself for not be accountable after receiving negative feedback from his teacher.
In addition, Learning responsibility by receiving punishment in the school will brings better results for students in the future when they will be more reproached if they do plagiarize and mimicking others’ ideas. Consequences of stealing other’s idea without punishment are more evident when people are independent and living without other’s supervision. For example, one of my classmates in high school was not interested in studying and always was cheating in doing his homework despite being supervised by teachers and parents; consequently, he graduated but got used to using others’ ideas. He never learned that it is his duty and should be refrained of copying assignments. In his life, he always thought that there would not be any reproaching for his behavior. Thus he did much immoral and unprofessional behavior. Eventually, he was arrested and now he is in prison. The only way to teach people how to be responsible for their whole lives is to giving feedback be reprimanding them during their adult age or schools.
Finally, if a student knows that his scores would be affected or he will be penalized if he cheats, he tries diligently to learn in lieu of copying stealing other students’ ideas. Earning better score is related to trying hard and they must learn that. As a case, in university, many of students were trying to copy from other assignments but when they realize that teacher knows and reduced their scores, they tried to do the homework independently and individually. A student who has punished for his plagiarizing would make better efforts to study hard instead of being worried about his scores after submitting copied material. He will learn that not only his score will be low, he learned nothing. Encouraging student to solve their problem and explain themselves is the result of punishing when they lift others ideas.
In a nutshell, while some people and schools consider distinct ways to prevent students from cheating, punishing students would be the most effective way to make students aware of their behavior and teach them how to prepare for their society. This way also motivates students to try more difficult to get a score that shows only their work not other’s ideas.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage: Our long-standing interest in elephants has led to several beliefs about surprising elephant behaviors. 1- Elephants Are Aw 83
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage: long-standing misconceptions in elephants has led to several beliefs about surprising elephant behaviors. 1- Elephants Are 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ocate the idea because it was not mine. If I had tried before I could have support...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...receiving punishment in the school will brings better results for students in the futu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ot be any reproaching for his behavior. Thus he did much immoral and unprofessional ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 15.1003584229 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 88.0 43.0788530466 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3335.0 1977.66487455 169% => OK
No of words: 667.0 407.700716846 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08196252842 4.48103885553 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87206053316 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.419790104948 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1028.7 618.680645161 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4100072495 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292287908089 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879056257285 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649290942464 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200912459206 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496226375947 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.