One of the most challenge problems in modern society is to have the most up-to-date skills for workplace. For solving this, government decides to give all adults over the age of 25 a training course to learn new skills. Do you think it is an effective way for government to spend its money?
In this day and age, with the cutting-edge information and technological advances, skilled talents are needed in every field more than ever. Therefore, a heated topic arises: whether it is wise for government to give all adults over 25 a training course for new skills. While a large group of people regard it unnecessary and money-wasting, I hold the opposite view for the following reasons.
First and foremost, after learning new skills in the course, people will act more creatively as well as active in their work, which can stimulate the vitality of a company. There is no denying that course like this can benefit individuals enormously, since it can broaden one’s horizon by teaching more advanced skills which one may has never seen in his company. Thus, it can promote workers to think in a different and creative way, and finally bring good to their company. For instance, my brother Jackson was once a stubborn man in work, who constantly insist his own process when he works. However, he gradually became flexible while dealing with some difficult tasks after a training course requested by local government. He told me that he really learned several useful up-to-date skills from it, like some easy way of operating computer and so on, which gave him inspiration of his new workstyle. Thanks to such course, Jackson’s company becomes a model of creativity.
Another point worth mentioning is that a training course for adults can promote their working efficiency and then accelerate the company’s improvement in the long run. As is known to all, the quickening pace of society require corporations to adapt it by augmenting efficiency. Thus, they have to make the best of their workers’ abilities, which can be enhanced through training courses. My government is a good case in point, for it keeps providing money for valuable courses in order to perfect itself. Not only workers deeply realized the necessity of utilizing labor-saving machinery, but also they made themselves master on relevant skills, which eventually boosts the corporation’s development.
Admittedly, there are workers who do not listen to the course carefully, which can be a waste of time and money to the government. Nevertheless, this phenomenon can be addressed by governments and society emphasize the importance of modern skills for their company as well as individuals. Therefore, its advantages overweigh its difficulties in general.
To put it in a nutshell, popularizing skill-learning course among adults over 25 would help them to get a clear perspective of nowadays technology, which the whole company and even society will profit from. Thus, the government would be well-advised to make this decision as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | s05140514 | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | lookforwind | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | lookforwind | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | lookforwind | 90 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | nolo | 66 | view |
- Teachers should give primary children aged5 10 assignments less than 30minutes because they have enough instructions in regular school classes Do you agree or disagree 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 83
- Parents should learn from children 70
- One can learn a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has 60
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity. For example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, even so, for instance, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27437641723 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04898198657 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589569160998 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6134762423 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.3 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278262379843 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774291651115 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741443509559 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15738598849 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523946959475 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.