In the past several decades, the world has gone through massive changes on both a societal and an individual level. Nowadays, more and more people feel adequate about what they have learned. They want to sharpen their ability in order to stand out from the crowd. Doing additional assignments and taking part in more group discussions are two common choices for them. Undeniably, the first one has its own advantages, but it is pale when compared with participating in more group activities.
To begin with, contributing ideas to others can serve as a tool to help us figure out our own weaknesses and improve them. Others can easily point out mistakes we may admit from an objective viewpoint, providing a comprehensive and accurate understanding of our ability. Therefore, this advice can be beneficial. For example, it is hard to imagine Scottie Pippen and Dennis Rodman becoming NBA All-Star if they do not participate in the tactic discussions prior to games and communication with their teammate, in which their teammate Michael Jordan and their coach constantly remind them to change their shot style and sharing the ball more frequently.
Admittedly, doing some extra assignments can help people to improve themselves. They can acquire plenty of knowledge from this process and learn how to tackle complicated tasks. Nevertheless, imagine an office worker who is busy connecting with clients, dealing with relationships between superiors and colleagues, and solving arduous assignments before the deadline; he has no time to waste on extra work. In that case, there is no more efficient approach to enhancing one’s career performance than participating in group discussions. Further, a group discussion also contributes to people’ communication skills. People who only focus on their jobs can never achieve success as a team. According to a recent study conducted by Harvard University, research has shown that when asked what the most important quality is you think for an employee, fifty-eight percent of employers chose communication skills and cooperation.
In a nutshell, it is undoubtedly a wiser option that participates more actively to improve one’s career performance for the reasons discussed above.
- Many people have learned a foreign language in their own country others have learned a foreign language in the country in which it is spoken Which is better Give the advantages of each and support your viewpoint 76
- There is no reason to be impolite rude to another person 52
- There are two companies which are both willing to offer you a job with the same rate of pay One offers interesting and challenging projects but gives almost no vacation days and the job of another company does not seem like interesting or challenging bu 76
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important Which do you prefer and why 76
- People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, as to, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99784412333 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637142857143 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7330046499 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.588235294 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230128645418 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666946477842 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563708522629 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135490277038 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343370818752 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.