Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.
No matter ancient or modern society, parents play a significant role in their children's lives. Also, the education is an open corridor to success in life. Therefore, Parents want to help and encourage their children to educate. Some people believe that parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. While Other hold an opposite view. Personally, I think that this topic is very interesting that will divide people because each person has a different opinion. Among the two opinions. I agree with former one more. Because nowadays education obtains more importance in different aspects rather the past time and parents know about it so that they help their children to study.
First and foremost, in Iran, today more families have one or two children and they try to provide different things for them. Moreover, not only they spend their time but also a lot of money to help their children to study hard. For example, one of my friends who had educated parents, she studied hard and she had a special teacher for each study. Because her parents liked that their child accepted in a good university and it is not the problem for them to spend more money for this aim. However, in the past families have many children and they could not pay attention to all of them.
Second, in these days, the importance of education is very obvious for everybody and parents encourage children to study and it can help them to get a good job in the future. For instance, when I was a child, my parents show different lives of people like doctors and professors of the university. They told me if I studied hard and achieved high grades, I will accept in the best fields like medicine so that I will have prestige and a lot of money in the future. Therefore, the view of people about education change during the time and they like having educated children to admire them for achievements.
To sum up, from what I have discussed above, I safely can come to the conclusion that nowadays parents help their children to educate in the best situation in compared to the past years.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. The invasion of the zebra mussel 80
- the cloud seeding 73
- The Voynich manuscript 55
- the decline of bird populations 73
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ducation than parents were in the past. While Other hold an opposite view. Personally...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 643, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ortance in different aspects rather the past time and parents know about it so that they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to everybody'.
Suggestion: obvious to everybody
...ys, the importance of education is very obvious for everybody and parents encourage children to study...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71891891892 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42752658435 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489189189189 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.328872379 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8947368421 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40962987895 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137451755775 0.076458572812 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170217894379 0.0737576698707 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264127739196 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146049718441 0.0645574589148 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.