in the past it was easier to identify what kinds of careea have successful future
Nowadays, researches show that just hardworking and working a lot do not guarantee prosperous of a work rather than before. Increasing the number of jobless people who had their own work reveal that we cannot predict whether a job is successful in future or not. To some extent I subscribe to the idea that today some reasons caused that people cannot predict their job prosperous in future.
To begin with, the development of science and technology always change people’s need so it is hard for companies because their product should fulfill all of the humans need. Furthermore they should be up-to-date because the speed of such development is high enough to make some products useless. For example, about twenty years ago, companies which produced smartphone believed that their product will fulfill humans need until a century but after a while public enthusiastic toward their product decrease. People do not buy their product because they expect some new properties that never provide by this old products. The companies know that the speed of producing a material should be equal to rate of science development to be prosperous.
Second, today many people have same job and provide same facilities for society but in the past rare jobs simulates was available and all the society needs afford by them. Increasing the number of occupants who do same works lead to the situation that companies cannot predict they are choose by people or not. For instance, consider a streets that all stores sell glasses which are exactly same in color or shape. When a customer come to this street for buying a product he also confused to select a store and buy his need so that’s obvious that seller are in same situation and are not able to predict whether they are choose by customers or not.
However, I believe that some strategies such as appealing advertising or digital marketing help people to guarantee their sells approximately until two or three years. Many companies maintain their sells in a good situation by spending more budget on their advertising through TV, radio or street billboard.
In conclusion, contemplating on aforementioned reasons prediction of a successful future for a job is harder than past. Many factors make this prediction hard such as high speed development of science and technology or similarities of careers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- people benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries 68
- playing computer games is a waste of time. children should not be allowd to play them 73
- people benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries 65
- workers are satisfied to do defferent tasks than doing similar tasks 83
- in the past it was easier toidentify what type of career or job would lead to a secure or successful future. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ple cannot predict their job prosperous in future. To begin with, the development of sci...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es because their product should fulfill all of the humans need. Furthermore they should be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... should fulfill all of the humans need. Furthermore they should be up-to-date because the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss. For example, about twenty years ago, companies which produced smartphone beli...
^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...s. Second, today many people have same job and provide same facilities for society...
^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
... that companies cannot predict they are choose by people or not. For instance, conside...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a street' or simply 'streets'?
Suggestion: a street; streets
...y people or not. For instance, consider a streets that all stores sell glasses which are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: same
...l stores sell glasses which are exactly same in color or shape. When a customer come to this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...re not able to predict whether they are choose by customers or not. However, I believ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08785529716 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75273489935 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50645994832 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4618272135 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0625 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0530765744187 0.236089414692 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213375261209 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04675832918 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375175735653 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372111597741 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.