People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one is the most useful A plant trees and create parks B persuade local shops to stop providing plastic bags to customers C increase access to public transporta

Essay topics:

People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one is the most useful?
A. plant trees and create parks
B. persuade local shops to stop providing plastic bags to customers
C. increase access to public transportation to reduce the number of automobiles on local roads

Protecting the natural environment is the crucial thing we need to do in modern society. Though all three environmentally-improving movements offered in the prompt are important, in my opinion, increasing access to public transportation to reduce the number of automobiles is the vital one.

To begin with, people need transportation every day, and increasing public transportation will greatly reduce pollution caused by vehicle exhaust. Convenient transportation enables people to go to any place they want that we cannot live without them in the modern society. Since the public transportation is not easily accessible in my society, almost every family, if not every adult owns a car. However, these huge numbers of automobiles produce pollution, harm our health, and decrease air quality. Thus, if communities can increase public transportation, then people can decrease their dependence on their own cars which not only produces pollution but also cost much to maintain. This way, the pollution caused by this huge number of automobiles can reduce significantly.

Another reason that we are required to reduce the number of automobiles is that this policy protects the habitats of wild animals. In order to enable people to use these automobiles conveniently and avoid traffic jams, we need vast areas of land to build not only roads but also parking lots. Thus, automobiles take lots of space which is the home of many other species. But if we reduce our private cars and take public transportation, then there are fewer automobiles. As a result, we no longer need to increase the numbers of roads, parking lots, and we can even return some space back to wild animals.

The last but most important reason is that this big number of automobiles consume crude oil tremendously which is the root cause of global warming. We can reduce this problem if we increase the access to public transportation. For example, the new mayor in my city increased the routes and the numbers of buses significantly. From then on, the amount of oil we consume in our city is reduced by 20% in one year. In other words, increasing public transportation is a useful strategy to slow the trend of global warming.

Admittedly, some people might argue that planting trees, creating parks, or persuading local shops to stop providing plastic bags are more important. However, with the reasons I mentioned above, I believe that increasing access to public transportation to reduce the number of automobiles is the most crucial one that communities should do immediately.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-04 jenny204 73 view
2020-08-30 jenny204 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user jenny204 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WANT_THAT_I[5]
Message: Did you mean 'want us to'?
Suggestion: want us to
... enables people to go to any place they want that we cannot live without them in the modern ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t if we reduce our private cars and take public transportation, then there are fe...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19323671498 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11018079528 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6981100322 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248278652346 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750296253211 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064098675656 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16090585459 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835139124989 0.0645574589148 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WANT_THAT_I[5]
Message: Did you mean 'want us to'?
Suggestion: want us to
... enables people to go to any place they want that we cannot live without them in the modern ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t if we reduce our private cars and take public transportation, then there are fe...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19323671498 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11018079528 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6981100322 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248278652346 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750296253211 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064098675656 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16090585459 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835139124989 0.0645574589148 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.