People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Learning new things is very important as it has never been. Many learn things from those at their own level, while others learn from specialized people, like teachers. Although I am struggling to say which one is better, I think learning things from specialized people is generally better due to people’s responsibility, higher level people’s experience, and people’s preference to learn rather than to compete with those at the same level.
The first point is responsibility. Although it may not be true for all, in my case, I cannot learn things from, let’s say, classmates. I do not know exactly why, but I think it is psychological situation. Thus, I feel more responsibility when I work with experienced people, especially older ones. For instance, I was planning to participate in country-wide physics Olympics, however there was not physics teacher who can make me prepared because of schedule. On the other hand, I tried to learn from student who is on 11th grade, however it did not work out due to reason I mentioned before.
The second point is the experience of the specialized people. Even though some people disagree, and there may be high intellectual fellow students, in any case, I prefer teachers due to the fact that teaching something does not only concern academic skills, but also teaching skills. For example, once I did not understand a subject at Math, and I tried to learn this from my classmate, who greatly understood the subject; but I could not learn anything. Instead I asked the teacher, and he was successful in teaching this subject, because of, I think, teaching skills, as I mentioned before.
As far as competition among fellows is concerned, I have to say that people rush to learn something, not because of they want it, instead they want to be better than others, which is not effective way to learn something.
To sum up, I have to mention that these are my reasons to learn from specialized people, but you may have other reasons to prefer learning from fellows. Every day we have to improve ourselves, it does not matter by which way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 70 | view |
- Pros and cons of the smart cars 70
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Are dinosaurs endothermic animal 80
- A person should never make an important decision alone 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ubject; but I could not learn anything. Instead I asked the teacher, and he was success...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...hat people rush to learn something, not because of they want it, instead they want to be better...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in any case, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89887640449 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8263452543 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2795924474 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324507977659 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916947364206 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122549176869 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170175917555 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153316969057 0.0645574589148 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ubject; but I could not learn anything. Instead I asked the teacher, and he was success...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...hat people rush to learn something, not because of they want it, instead they want to be better...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in any case, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89887640449 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8263452543 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2795924474 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324507977659 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916947364206 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122549176869 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170175917555 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153316969057 0.0645574589148 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.