People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors

Essay topics:

People learn things better from those at their own level—such as fellow students or co-workers—than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.

Some people like to learn things from people they like, such as their peers and coworkers. The atmosphere is relatively quieter. But I am rational, and to learn more knowledge effectively, I think that a highly-skilled teacher or boss might be a better option.

If one's tutor has had professional training on how to teach, then learning with him will be efficient. For example, before math teachers become able to teach students, they need to learn psychology and pedagogy. They need to learn how to make students think, and how to learn efficiently. After many years of teaching, they can sum up where students tend to make mistakes. Their education and psychology experience can effectively pass knowledge to students, and can sum up a type of problem according to students' weaknesses., and obviously, a friend cannot do this.

If a student wants to learn, then he should ask someone smarter than him. I will still use a teacher as an example. The teacher is going to teach a system of knowledge, and only after the student has learned this knowledge systematically, instead of piecing together something you don't know, can you proceed to the next stage of learning based on this system. For example, the derivative can only be learned after the limit function, the differential function can only be learned after the derivative, the integral can only be learned after the differential function, and the calculus can only be learned after the integral. This set of knowledge obviously cannot be taught by a friend.

If a problem is only a minor problem, a friend can help you solve it, because they are right beside you, and you only need to turn around or raise a head to get help, and don't need to pay a visit to a busy teacher's office. It is similar to when your bike tire is flat. You only have to borrow a neighbor's bike pump instead of the bike fixing center. But when your bike is broken, then you must go to the bike fixing center instead of asking a neighbor.

Let the professionals do the professional thing. If you want to learn systematic knowledge, then do not refuse a skilled tutor, because he is your best option.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-20 Alana Gerber 88 view
2022-12-29 villian7 68 view
2022-11-18 rpinisetti8 70 view
2022-11-11 Tanvayee15 73 view
2022-08-10 Louissun 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Louissun :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
Some people like to learn things from people they like, such as their peers a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...or boss might be a better option. If ones tutor has had professional training on ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...stead of piecing together something you dont know, can you proceed to the next stage...
^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...around or raise a head to get help, and dont need to pay a visit to a busy teachers ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... and dont need to pay a visit to a busy teachers office. It is similar to when your bike...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, for example, i think, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73796791444 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72148384265 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4755316276 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2631578947 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.89473684211 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123776317905 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431076640026 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541184764177 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818254892605 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703388473743 0.0645574589148 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.