People should insist on a challenging plan rather than a practical plan.
Systematic plans can bring us organized life and success. However, people may ask which kind of plan is better: the more challenging plans or the more practical ones. For me, challenging plans are more important to humans than those which are easy to come true.
First, challenging plans propel our society to move forward. The invention of the airplane serves as a good example. Flying like a bird in the sky has been a human dream for thousands of years. Yet, due to the technical and material limitations, most of the people just took this plan as fantasy that would never come true. The Wright Brothers stuck to their aspiration to fly and never gave up trying, despite the fact that other did not understand them and laughed at them. They ultimately succeeded. Their great invention brought people into the blue sky and completely changed the way we travel. So many challenging plans have been realized that enabled our world to move forward, such as the advent of computers, the internet, submarines, and so on. And these are just a drop in the bucket, Society progresses as these plans are realized.
Second, challenging plans can nurture one's perseverance. The success stories of many inventors can testify my point. When Edison first planned to invent the electric lamp, it seemed like a ridiculous joke to his peers. In order to realize his plan, he did thousands of tests to find the most suitable materials. When he repeatedly failed, his wife and friends tried to persuade him to give up his unrealistic plan. However, Edison insisted on continuing and eventually succeeded. In his quest to find a safe form of dynamite, Alfred Nobel suffered failures as Edison did. What's was worse, his younger brother was killed in one of his experiments and the government event once forbade his research. Yet, Nobel did nothing but persisted. In the end, he won worldwide recognition for his remarkable finding. Challenging plans made these great men strong enough to view every defeat as another step toward success.
Finally, challenging plans may bring happy accidents. Consider the discovery of gunpowder. In ancient China, many people had the impossible to achieve dream of living forever. They believed that certain kind of pills could be made that would give grant them immortality. In the process of making the magic pill, they mixed unusual medicines together and accidentally stumbled upon the formula for gunpowder. This unexpected result is one of the most important inventions in human history
To sum up, challenging plans can aid in the advancement of society, teach the people value of perseverance and result in happy accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-06-22 | meet96301 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | danielkim736 | 83 | view |
- A government should focus its budget more on young children education than on universities. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today." 70
- A government should focus its budget more on young children’s education than on universities. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today." 76
- People should insist on a challenging plan rather than a practical plan. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 39, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... Second, challenging plans can nurture ones perseverance. The success stories of ma...
^^^^
Line 9, column 573, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... Nobel suffered failures as Edison did. Whats was worse, his younger brother was kill...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.659878477 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0652159613 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8965517241 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1724137931 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68965517241 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336272000814 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816830972419 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882975785659 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198043434598 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918276909056 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.