pets should be treated like family member. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? give reasons to support your opinion
If you are alone and tired of solitary, I would recommend you to have a pet. You will have much fun and make a good friendship with them and go everywhere with to release your depression. However, when it comes to the idea that pets be treated as part of our family, I strongly disagree. I have two reasons for this which, I will explore in the following essay.
First, pets are not human to be part of our family. It is right that when we broke with any of our friends, or when we miss any of our family, we usually buy a pet to forget them. However, pets can never be like members of our family because when you fall in to a problem than devastate you, it is your family members whom you share your problem with, who listen to you and give you advice to cope with the problem. In addition, what do you think, can your mother substitute you with a dog? Of course no. you even cannot imagine that because your mother has bred you nine months in her body and more than ten years after that, so that you become adult. She fed you by her milk when you could not eat anything else. Do you still think that you have the same value as a dog or any other pet has, to your mother?
Second, pets cannot bond emotionally to us as much as our family member does. When our pets die or we get rid of them, we may concern few days, we are going to buy another one even better and more beautiful one. On the contrary, If, God forbidden, your family member passes away, would you still concern a few days? Or could you find anything better than that? Of course not, nothing can compensate with them, because its human beings, particularly our family member, whom we share our emotions and feelings with.
Pets are good for having fun and entertainment, but they can never be treated like your family member. Try to have them for a while and change them for better ones.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-11-20 | Sharifkhaliqi321@gmail.com | 60 | view |
- what famous place would you like to visit? use details and reasons to support your response 70
- people have various ways of relieving stress. what are some of the ways that you find most effective in relieving stress? Give reasons and examples to support your response 10
- What famous place would you like to visit? use details and reasons to support you respond 60
- people have various ways of relieving stress what are some of the ways that you find most effective in relieving stress give reasons and examples to support your response 77
- some people prefer to work in groups on projects, while other people prefer to work alone. what are the advantages of each, and which do you prefer? use details and examples to support your response 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or any other pet has, to your mother? Second, pets cannot bond emotionally to ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, while, in addition, of course, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25352112676 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11215768288 2.67179642975 79% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50985915493 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8597906053 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4736842105 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335828832191 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112973601005 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856153496752 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206652140794 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591659655297 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 11.7677419355 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.37 10.9000537634 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.35 8.01818996416 79% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 86.8835125448 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.