Playing games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play games

Essay topics:

Playing games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play games.

Some people may say that playing computer games is great for recreational purposes. However, I agree that playing games is waste of time. I believe, playing computer games consumes a lot of time, can impact a child’s health and blocks the connection between children and nature.
First, computer games are addictive and children keep playing them without realizing how much time they are wasting. Instead of playing those computer games, if children did something else like studying or playing an instrument they could achieve more in life. For instance, when I was much younger, as a child it seemed like that playing computer games was the sole purpose of my life. I woke up to play games and went to sleep thinking about the next level that I had to reach in those games. While I glued myself to the computer playing those games, I was completely oblivious of all things that I had to like studying. As a result, I received really poor grades and I was unable to get admitted to a good school. Till date, I regret that and I feel had I not played computer games all day and studied I could have been to a better school. Hence, playing computer is truly nothing but a waste of time since it keeps one from doing something more productive.
Second, playing computer games is detrimental to health. My eight-year-old cousin is addicted to computer games and he already has to wear big goggles. According to his doctor, playing computer games has affected his eyes and now he will need glasses all his life for proper vision. Furthermore, as children keep playing computer games they do not play or participate in sports much. Consequently, physical activity among children has declined and obesity among them have risen. It is unfortunate and children like my cousin do not deserve that. Hence, it is imperative that parents keep young children away from computer games so that their health is not impacted negatively, after all health is wealth.
Third, playing computer games all day keeps children away from the outdoors. Most children these days, are so addicted to those computer screens that they do not go outside or play with their peers. Furthermore, they do not get to interact with nature enough or appreciate it. Children should not play computer games but go outdoors and enjoy the beauty nature has got to offer.
People still state that everything in moderation is the best so children should be allowed to play computer games as it offers a great opportunity for them to have an enjoyable time. Nevertheless, I still believe that playing computer is a waste of time and it has significant negative impacts on children.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-30 YasamanEsml 73 view
2023-04-10 wyc 70 view
2023-04-10 wyc 70 view
2023-04-10 KimiaKermanshahian 73 view
2023-03-25 sonyeoso 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant negative impacts on children.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, third, while, after all, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83885209713 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57559044973 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472406181015 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0516762385 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511137128068 0.236089414692 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188387691183 0.076458572812 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123618723856 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360812834699 0.150856017488 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742633843043 0.0645574589148 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.