public
Both the internet and public traدsportaion play prominent rules in our life and make it better and easier. When it comes to the question that whether a government should invest in the improvement of either internet access or public traدsportation system, it brings up a controversial debate so that opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that the improvement of internet access is more important while others think that the advantages of good public transportation outweigh the benefits of better internet access. Personally, I, to a huge extent, believe that a better transportation system has more importance. I will explicate my reasons behind this statement through the following essay.
The first reason that immediately comes into my mind is that traffic control is possible through an advanced transportation system. As a recently conducted research at the university of brown, tracking people in many regions throughout the world indicated that people by access to advanced transportation systems are more likely to not use their own cars and instead take public transportation to get their workplaces. Scientists concluded that with this trend, it is more anticipated that in the future will be less car than today in the streets and traffic jam will be managed.
The second reason that makes me think in this way is that the quality of air will be high if transportation systems use new technologies in the related fields. To be more specific, good public transportation encourages people to use them rather than personal cars. As a result, fewer cars in the streets is meant lower carbon dioxide emissions into the air. Indeed, in this way, not only people can experience clean air, but also it causes low health problems due to air pollution.
To wrap the argument, if we take a glance into the benefits of the improved transportation system, it will be soon recognized that it is more worthwhile to invest funds, as it helps to manage the traffic jam and makes the air to have higher quality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | younessam | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
- sports and social programs as well as science 76
- sea otter decline 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 71
- technology 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...at opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that the improvement of int...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
...h an advanced transportation system. As a recently conducted research at the university of brown, tracking pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08035714286 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95640896259 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8774714664 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151603667991 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613469443661 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801631230543 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087579345738 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708098264851 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.