public transportation
Public transportation has become important part of human’s life. Without transportation, it would be difficult for people to move from one place to another. Some people believe that the government should spend money on improving roads and the highways, while others disagree. Personally, I think that the government should spend money on improving a public transportation as it has many advantages.
Firstly, public transportation helps to keep the environment free from pollution. In other words, if public transportation is improved and well maintained, people will be more willing to take public transportations like subways or buses instead of driving personal vehicles, which would lead to less pollution and fresher and cleaner atmosphere. For example, when I was in Shanghai on business, an international metropolis, I was very much impressed by the popularity of public transportation. Even though Shanghai is an international metropolis and has an enormous population as well as huge amount of commuting people, its air quality is on the top of the quality list around the country, which largely could be contributed to the well-developed and elaborate transportation system.
Secondly, public transportation will be less expensive. It is no doubt that daily commuting fees takes a large part of the daily expenses, which actually is a huge burden for people, especially those with a low-paid salary. However, public transportation could help them alleviate economic pressure since the cost of public transportation is shared by thousands of commuters, thus it would be a cost-efficient choice for office workers. If government does not invest in funding public transportation, people living in the community are more likely to be under the economic pressure due to the increasing living cost. It would be no surprise to find that the cost of living in a small city is much higher than that of living in an international metropolis like Shanghai.
Thirdly, taking public transportation can avoid problems of finding parking space. Nowadays, it is not an easy thing to hunt for a suitable parking spot, especially during the morning rush hours. Office workers have to spend a big deal of time to find empty parking space, which is definitely a waste of time. For example, my college, Lucy used to drive her private car to g to work for the sake of convenience. However, daily parking takes her large amount of time and sometimes she even would be late due to finding empty parking space, which brings about much unnecessary trouble. From then on, she started to commute by taking public transportation that provides true convenience.
In conclusion, considering that public transportation is able to be beneficial to environment and cost-efficient and convenient for commuters, I believe that government should invest on transportation infrastrcture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | younessam | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it would be difficult for people to move from one place to another. Some people b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38137472284 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28586795769 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50110864745 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6956736944 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.35 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.55 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428454383626 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172613479659 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168850936783 0.0737576698707 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288024381446 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715868517608 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.