receive training in college
With the development of the society, the competitions in the working place are becoming more and more fierce. As a result, the preparation in the university is also very significant. Some people prefer to present a specialized course for the students who will look for internships or jobs which are consistent with the course in campus. Meanwhile, some people argue that students should take(接受) some comprehensive training in the universities to get ready for work. I prefer that the students take an internship program during the campus time. My views and examples are given blow.
First of all, students can learn lots of skills and prerequisites for the work by taking a complete training course. Given the huge change happened in workplace or office recent years, students have to be familiar with the modern working methods. In this way, the help from the university may be very beneficial for students. For instance, in modern IT corporations, like Amazon, Google or Apple, a relaxing, cozy yet necessary for team work or cooperation method is becoming widespread in their workplace. If the students, especially for some exceptional students, having outstanding grades or academic achievements, who are afraid of doing work in groups, do not get familiar with that environment, they may get upset and worried with their works. Nevertheless, supposing these graduates have taken some trainings to simulate what may happen in these IT giant companies, they will probably perform better than those who never take courses about that.
Second, students can finish the classes and master them under the guidance of stuffs of the university even by oneself, however, they may not be dexterous for work independently, which needs lots of time and vigor. Whatever students do not understand, they can ask for their classmates, professors or just depend on books in the library or even search the Internet for an answer. On the contrary, skills that have to be accumulated in workplace cannot be taught by someone in the campus. Consequently, it is necessary for university to give chance for students to do internships during the time in campus in order to fulfill the requirement of the jobs.
Granted, students taking a major which is urgently needed in the market will have a higher tendency to be employed. They have lots of specialized classes for the work. However, times change and working situations may change too. Taking accounting as an example, accountants just had to deal with paperwork. But, with the emergence of artificial intelligence, the working method have changed completely that accountants’ work can be finished by computers automatically and the significance of accountants is worse than any time in the history. Had some accountants taken some general courses about comprehensive skills for accounting, they would be more stable and sounder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-24 | Angelina2016 | 3 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | Naomi_manager | 83 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | Naomi_manager | 76 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y views and examples are given blow. First of all, students can learn lots of...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulfill the requirement of the jobs. Granted, students taking a major which i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, while, for instance, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2316017316 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.948132202 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495670995671 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.193553504 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.863636364 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.59090909091 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0273253718692 0.236089414692 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0102086776434 0.076458572812 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260585895794 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0192118963774 0.150856017488 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197847416379 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.