For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers?
Teachers play a crucial role in children life. They teach them not only related courses but also how to be a proper person for the society. Teachers assessment is one of the indispensable function of any school to make sure that all of them should their responsibility. Schools conduct the different approach to evaluate them including, giving questionary papers to students to assess their teachers, using teachers to realize success rate and popularity of a particular teacher. Among different options, I subscribe to the idea that is more advantageous to evaluate teachers by their own students.
First and foremost, students have seen various teachers during their formative years of education. Accordingly, they have well-rounded thoughts and information regarding whether a certain teacher is good or not. It should be stressed that students have been in touch with two to five teachers in each year of their education. On the other hand, they spend more time with a teacher than anybody else in the school. If a teacher did a good job, they can easily understand.
More importantly, assessment of teachers by students can have a proper impact on the teachers. When a tutor notices that they are going to be assessed by students, they would show more responsibility. Furthermore, in the case of unsatisfaction in the children, they would put as much effort as possible to modify their teaching approach, failing that would have a detrimental effect on their career. Take my own experience as an example. I had an economics teacher during secondary school. Although he was a knowledgeable person, compare to other teachers he would not use latest technologies in the class like Powerpoint presentation. We needed to write down from the blackboard and it was a huge distraction for us. After assessment, we mentioned this problem and told it to the supervisor orally. For the next year, we heard that he changed his approach to teaching. This example shows that it is more beneficial to assess teachers by students
In a nutshell, I truly believe that it would be more beneficial if children evaluate their own teachers because first, they spend most of their time with him/her. Second, assessment by teachers would lay the foundation of having elite and diligent teachers in the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-28 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | nolo | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
- A company should identify those employees who excel at entry level positions and place an emphasis on their training and professional development will increase employees' personal fulfillment and enable them to serve the company to the best of their 33
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 76
- agree or disagree. It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life 73
- construction in countrysides (attempt 2) 76
- Some people prefer doing sports on their own, such as running, while others like to do sports in groups. Which one do you prefer? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 570, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'use the latest'.
Suggestion: use the latest
... compare to other teachers he would not use latest technologies in the class like Powerpoi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 947, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eneficial to assess teachers by students In a nutshell, I truly believe that it w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10079575597 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93967663842 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535809018568 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9892715254 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5714285714 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339220552437 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110485700419 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739912179916 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23066004878 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412157993513 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.