Evaluating teachers’ performance plays a vital role in the future of societies, for their efficiency has an influence on youths’ knowledge. In this regard, there is a doubt between decision-makers whether to assess teachers’ efficiency by their co-workers or students. Although both of these sides have several advantageous and disadvantageous, I, personally, support the co-workers’ evaluation in comparison with students due to several conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
To begin with, teachers can better realize students’ learning performances. As a group of students loses marks in a particular lesson, it means that their teacher cannot transfer his/her knowledge to the students. Other teachers can easily investigate students’ learning trend, which directly shows the impact of their teachers. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. Assume that a student has got a good mark in all of their lessons except one. There are two different hypotheses about this issue including the student might get into trouble, or their teacher’s efficiency was low. In this regard, only other teachers can reveal which of these issues is correct in this condition. Therefore, teachers’ assessment is more beneficial.
Moreover, teachers are adults and their decisions are more rational than students. It is crystal clear that students may get a low mark to a strict, knowledgeable teacher. However, these kinds of teachers have a remarkable positive influence on students’ future job position, for they can learn to work harder with more disciplines. Therefore, other teachers can decide accurately about these types of issues without emotion.
All in all, as learning students is a critical issue for societies, other teachers should evaluate their co-workers’ efficiency rather than students because the two important reasons which can be read in the previous paragraphs. Consequently, I, totally, believe that teachers should decide on other teachers’ performances.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree？ It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise. Explain your answer with examples and specific reasons. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 76
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to trend'
Suggestion: to trend
...ily investigate students' learning trend, which directly shows the impact of the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e on other teachers' performances.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84717607973 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36980921959 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.513629063 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.529411765 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387754004961 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148468917361 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857299095239 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26357195564 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286578667329 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.