Should charity organizations use sad or happy or both types of pictures as advertisements?
I think using both types of images will be the most effective method. First, the usage of sad images can touch people's emotions and evoke attention and support for charitable causes. To be specific, commercials of people who have incurable or hard-to-cured diseases can reflect the plight of people who are under the torment of illness and their desire for a healthy life and can inspire support for the welfare and rehabilitation treatment of people with disabilities since people will pity them. Second, happy pictures can inspire people's optimism and hope by showcasing the positive impact and changes brought about by charitable activities, thereby encouraging more people to participate in charitable activities. For example, displaying images of beneficiaries' recovery or happiness can allow people to see the actual effects of charitable work, thereby increasing trust and support for charitable organizations. In a nutshell, utilizing both types of pictures is the best way to promote people participating in charity organizations.
- Should charity organizations use sad or happy or both types of pictures as advertisements 60
- Assignments are indispensable on our part for children as they grow up it has become a routine students do the work and teachers correct the position Some people believe that the assignments should be restrained while others support the opposite opinion T 61
- Should advertisements use sad or happy or both types of pictures when advertising for charity programs 60
- Explain how the lecture refutes the reason that the passage states about smart cars 85
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
I think using both types of images will b...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 43.0788530466 7% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 1977.66487455 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 159.0 407.700716846 39% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54088050314 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 4.48103885553 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08728807408 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 212.727598566 46% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 618.680645161 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.6003584229 29% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.5591128501 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.833333333 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130183979685 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090826198085 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820276726521 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130183979685 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 58.1214874552 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.