Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?
History is a controversial debate, including whatever had occurred for the civilizations over the past million centuries. Nowadays, a plethora of people is in a conviction that protection of old buildings is one of the primary duties of each government. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that historic constructions belong to the past, and there is no need to be preserved. I am of the opinion that all the choices have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, history is an integral part of each culture as it plays the crucial role to form the current societies. Indeed, without the previous occurrences, people live in completely varied circumstance. Therefore, buildings as the symbols of each epoch can convey numerous facts about the governors, citizens, religion related to that period, and that is why no one can overlook the high value of this debris. Besides, architectural monuments talk about the artistic heritage that cultivates pride of the past as it makes them unique in the world. For instance, the well-known ancient civilization of Iran, Hakamanesh, built admirable constructions - Takht Jamshid. Iranian is still proud of their empire due to his power and logic and peace. Although most of the construction had been demolished, the remains are enough for distinguishing old Iran from many previous countries.
Another significant issue which should be taken into consideration is the economic facets of preservation and restoration. Historical buildings are being accounted as great tourism attractions. Many people are keen to visit spectacular sites which one day they were the spirit of the city. In some countries - such as Turkey, Italy, Greek - that are historically rich, the government allocates considerable budget for preserving their buildings to encourage more people to come to their countries. Moreover, restoring the local buildings brings more jobs and extra income by applying the growing segment of expertise that becomes unemployment. Adding this note that, undoubtedly, erecting a new building is remarkably more costly, than conserving the old one.
On the basis of those mentioned above, I am convinced that looking after the historic buildings brings the variety of advantages for the human. Since people not only get acquainted with some notable issues such as history, culture, and art of that period but also live in a better economic situation which has been improved thanks to a load of tourists and new occupations.
- 34 Integrated Why did the sea cows in Siberia become extinct 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
- TPO 4 Integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y no one can overlook the high value of this debris. Besides, architectural monument...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241758241758 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.147252747253 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112087912088 0.0866891130778 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.032967032967 0.046263068375 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0241758241758 0.0685040099705 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120879120879 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0505494505495 0.0351676179071 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01147070861 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0241758241758 0.0309702414327 78% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118681318681 0.0887237588012 134% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00879120879121 0.0209618222197 42% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0197802197802 0.0139019557991 142% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2583.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 409.0 408.028673835 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31540342298 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388753056235 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315403422983 0.251872472559 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237163814181 0.174417080927 136% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.173594132029 0.112833075102 154% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01147070861 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61369193154 0.524397521467 117% => OK
Word variations: 77.0360766 59.2087087015 130% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5263157895 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2685281146 48.84282405 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.947368421 120.699889404 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.644075263715 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 53.0666580878 45.7405998639 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.02150537634 1.45489161554 139% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0216082129529 0.300154397459 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0548340133901 0.103427244359 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0372395328503 0.0752933317313 49% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.484446363294 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121775191385 0.151897553556 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0103046754785 0.114077575197 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0175549287815 0.0781384742642 22% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.45492272169 0.336927656856 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.07952578629 0.067059652881 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0185695953908 0.210909579961 9% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147755980532 0.0618886996521 24% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.