Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
At the turn of the new century, in modern societies, with the development of humans’ modern society more and more people tend to flourish their cities. As a matter of fact, to fulfill such a requirement they need to establish new building such as factories, companies, and so on. Therefore, they prefer to destroy old buildings and construct new ones for developing their cities. Although some people agree with this function, I believe that the society should preserve its historic buildings because of maintaining the culture and attracting tourists.
First and foremost, maintaining culture is a significant advantage of deserving historic buildings. It goes without saying that every nation has its own custom which presents the culture of it. In fact, as far as I am concerned, every person should get familiar with the culture of his antecedents because it can help the person views life from a different perspective. A prominent psychologist in my country claims that when children become aware of their cultures and customs, not only can they shape their personality, but also make their goals in their lives. As a result, preserving ancient and tradition construction in a society leave profound impacts on its people’s lives.
Another subtle point is that, attracting tourists can be considered another impact of preserving old building. It is crystal-clear that nowadays one of the most important ways for flourishing a country is assimilating tourists because they can bring prospers to the society. According to a recent research done by archeologists in my country conducted that existing old buildings can boom economical condition. For example, I live in a historic city that there are a lot of ancient buildings such as palaces, gardens, museums, and so on. Every year a large number of tourists enter to my city for visiting these building. In fact, they spend lots of money for entering these buildings and buy traditional handicrafts, so they can cause develop in my city. Hence, what has made old buildings so valuable is attracting the vast range of tourists.
In a nutshell, it is obvious that the modern society has gone through some changes by the enormous impacts of tending to modernize. Although constructing new buildings can help a nation to be prosperous, destroying old buildings is not a good solution. In fact, how can people who live in a modern society get familiar with their culture in the past? How can young people cognize of their personality? How can a city attract new tourists? Undoubtedly, answers to all of these questions are conserving ancient buildings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | ashish150395 | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | sena | 71 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | Hà Phúc Khang | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | osfallatah89 | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | ayush.rga | 70 | view |
- integrated 48 60
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s government to take to protect the environment?1. Fund research to develop environmentally friend 70
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- integrated 47 60
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...gardens, museums, and so on. Every year a large number of tourists enter to my city for visiting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2375 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.15625 0.158761421928 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0958333333333 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.025 0.046263068375 54% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0625 0.0685040099705 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139583333333 0.118717715034 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0541666666667 0.0351676179071 154% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95154727052 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0208333333333 0.0309702414327 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0895833333333 0.0887237588012 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.025 0.0209618222197 119% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0145833333333 0.0139019557991 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2630.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 426.0 408.028673835 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17370892019 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389671361502 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.326291079812 0.251872472559 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237089201878 0.174417080927 136% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.161971830986 0.112833075102 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95154727052 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50234741784 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 56.2164480347 59.2087087015 95% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.3636363636 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2023754183 48.84282405 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.545454545 120.699889404 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.644075263715 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 51.9927443449 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.76923076923 1.45489161554 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206532945348 0.300154397459 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107269835562 0.103427244359 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0694595085417 0.0752933317313 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.441236199163 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0846276419907 0.151897553556 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830076185347 0.114077575197 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565295659167 0.0781384742642 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.340620752518 0.336927656856 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0369553131479 0.067059652881 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15601261434 0.210909579961 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581048858957 0.0618886996521 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.