Should a factory be built in your community?
In the modern era, building factories near towns has raised a lot of debate among academicians. Some people hold the view that in order to promote the development of industrialization and, in turn, raising economic growth, the government should allow businesses to build their sites around cities to facilitate their accessibility. However, others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that establishing factories near towns may pose a lot of threats and challenges to people who live in their vicinity. I personally believe that the advantages of building factories near cities cannot outweigh its disadvantages. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through some notable reasons.
My first reason and maybe the most significant one is that before making profits, humans should think about sustainable development. We should be cognizant of the fact that money cannot guarantee the improvement of living standards on its own. It is very important to keep a balance between financial prosperity and other aspects of a happy life. If factories grow near cities, the local environment will tend to be polluted with toxic chemicals, which will pose many threats to neighboring people and even their next generations. Factories will release poisonous fumes into the atmosphere and will dump their waste materials into the local waterways. Recently, cancer rates have risen in the districts near industrial parks, leading some researchers to believe that factories and their waste are the root cause of these problems.
My second reason is that factories not only can release large amounts of pollutants into the atmosphere but also cause a great deal of noise pollution. If businesses are permitted to locate their sites near cities, local inhabitants can no longer enjoy the quietness of the country. They should every day face a lot of noises made by factories, which may also bring about a lot of mental and physical disorders. That's why in many developed countries, businesses do not have permission to establish their factories near towns.
My last reason is that by building factories near cities, some advantages that cities have, like their potential to attract tourists and encourage the tourism industry, may be negatively affected because the beauty and glory of these areas will be destroyed by factories and their waste materials. This way, the countryside no longer appeal to people, and an excellent financial resource will be lost.
In summary, based on the aforementioned arguments, there is a myriad of reasons that convince me to support the idea of forbidding the establishment of factories near cities. Some of them, such as the risk of polluting air and other natural resources, making a lot of noises, damaging the tourism industry, are mentioned above. However, that was like a story in a nutshell. Actually, there are some other reasons and examples challenging this claim, which are not mentioned above. All in all, I firmly believe that the government should not permit businesses to build factories near cities.
- Highways or public transportation 90
- Will you spend your money to buy a piece of jewelry or a ticket for a concert 70
- In some countries people are not allowed to smoke in public places Do you think it is a bad rule or a good rule 73
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 80
- When people succeed it s because of hard work or luck 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...ay pose a lot of threats and challenges to people who live in their vicinity. I personall...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...a lot of mental and physical disorders. Thats why in many developed countries, busine...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2693877551 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86699177116 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518367346939 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 804.6 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8132527821 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.363636364 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170415776081 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519823178392 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422566649554 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108021842919 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348920346498 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.