With the enhancement of living quality, art is increasingly important in everyone's daily life. With or without awareness, though many citizens and companies contribute to culture activities, the benefits of the arts cannot fully realized without the contribution of government. That is why I believe that government ought to support artists.
First and for most, supporting arts could enhance economic developments. In the past decades, cities in both developed and developing countries have seen boost in economy and a ballooning support to various fields from government. Investing in arts and artists creates jobs and tax revenue. Consider how many art museums and galleries have been established around the countries. A vivid illustration is the Louvre, as one of the symbols of Paris, becomes a place where travels must visit. People appreciate fantasy of Monalisa of Da Vinci and the beauty of Venus of Melos, getting mental delight and comforts from arts; meanwhile they also create GDP for France and tax revenue for the government via paying for tickets and shopping.
Further, investing in artists could also create educational assets. With the life quality improved, many people's basic wants are satisfied and they seek to nonmaterial or spiritual goals. Many parents help their children cultivate a sense of love in arts such as painting and playing instruments. Some studies reveal that learning arts from childhood contributes to balanced development in left and right brain. Supporting artists may a
Last but not least, some traditional art format is disappearing because traditional artists cannot earn a living from it and supporting artists can help preserve traditional culture. For example, paper-cutting is a traditional art format in my hometown. Young people refuse to learn such Paper-cutting skills since that being a paper-cutting artist cannot earn money to support themselves in the modern society. However, if the government could have supported paper-cutting artists, things would not be that worse. No one can deny that traditional art is an invaluable mark of traditional culture. Thus, it would be reasonable for governments to support traditional artists.
Overall, with all the aspects mentioned above combined, I strongly embrace the idea that, the governments, without doubt, should support the artists, as they would drive the economy boost, maintain educational assets and preserve traditional art.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we eat today is much healthier than in the past. 80
- Should the government support artists or should artists support themselves 92
- 17. The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station.To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growt 60
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been unique to the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeol 83
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see one. In 1768 the animal became exti 90
cannot fully realized
cannot be fully realized
Supporting artists may a
Supporting artists may be a ???
Sentence: With the life quality improved, many people's basic wants are satisfied and they seek to nonmaterial or spiritual goals.
Error: nonmaterial Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 375 350
No. of Characters: 2019 1500
No. of Different Words: 214 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.401 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.384 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.871 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 159 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 130 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.015 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.502 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5