Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation? Why? Use sepecific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Governments have many critical issues in urban management. Each of these issues has specific priority. It is very important to follow this priority. In my view developing and improving public transportation is more important than improving the roads and highways. A well-developed public transportation system has many benefits for all members of cities. With standard buses, trains and subways we can obviously sense the reduction of air pollution, diminution the traffic and have more interaction among people in society.
Today the air pollution is one of the most significant global concerns. All of countries try to skeleton some plans for reduce the dose of pollution in the air. There are many reasons that cause this dangerous situation. Cars are one of these reasons. They use the fuel and release carbon dioxide in the air. Carbon dioxide is one of green home gases that are extremely harmful for earth’s atmosphere. If governments have a plan to carry out suitable infrastructure and tools for public transportation, most of the people use this system instead of their car. For example if employees of a big company or students of a university have access to bus station or subway station they absolutely choose these options instead of personal car. By diminish the amount of car in the roads we can see the tremendous reduction of harmful gases in the air.
Traffic in the roads is another critical issue for governments. There are a lot of solutions for solve this problem. Well-designed public transportation system is one the effective ways for traffic reduction. People prefer public transportation because is cheaper and faster in comparison to the personal cars. When we have regular access to the buses or trains in everywhere of the city such as in near of our home and our company, we absolutely prefer to use this reliable system instead of our car.
If people can use buses and subways in anywhere they have the opportunity to communicate with each other. Individuals in their isolated cars can’t talk with each other. Personal cars decrease the amount of connection among people. With well-developed public transportation, we will have more active and dynamic society. People see each other every day and have this chance to interact and share their knowledge.
Governments have many difficulties with increase the population and other related tensions. They should have pinpoint planning for handle these issues. It is very to choose the best solution to deal with these troubles. I think develop well-established public transportation system it has more profit than extending the roads and highways. With deploy confidential system, we can see the decline of natural and air pollution, diminution the traffic and prevent our society from apathetic.
- It has been said,"Not everything that is learned is contained in books". Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? 60
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation? Why? Use sepecific reasons and details to develop your essay. 60
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinions. 60
- You have the opportunity to visit a foreign country for two weeks Which country would you like to visit Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice 76
sense the reduction of air pollution, diminution the traffic
sense the reduction of air pollution, diminution of the traffic
Sentence: All of countries try to skeleton some plans for reduce the dose of pollution in the air.
Description: The token for is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to for and reduce
Sentence: There are a lot of solutions for solve this problem.
Description: The fragment a lot of is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Description: The token for is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to for and solve
By diminish the amount of car in the roads we can see the tremendous reduction
By diminishing the amount of car in the roads we can see the tremendous reduction
because is cheaper and faster
because it is cheaper and faster
Governments have many difficulties with increase the population and other related tensions.
Governments have many difficulties with the increase of population and other related tensions.
They should have pinpoint planning for handle these issues.
They should have pinpoint planning for handling these issues.
It is very to choose
It is very easy/hard to choose
I think develop well-established public transportation system it has more profit than extending the roads
I think developing well-established public transportation system has more profit than extending the roads
With deploy confidential system,
by deploying confidential system,
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
Read a good grammar book.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 18 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 30 15
No. of Words: 449 350
No. of Characters: 2287 1500
No. of Different Words: 206 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.603 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.094 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.88 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 171 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 124 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.967 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.209 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.2 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.259 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.437 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5