Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Public transportation is very important part of our society. In modern city, time is very important, therefore the way of transportation could save our time. Public transportation is one of best way for all the people. Some people say that governments should spend more money on improving roads and highways, while others believe that public transportation should be expend more money by governments. In my view, it's better spend more on improving public transportation than roads for two noticeable reasons.
First, expense will decrease dramatically. When public transportation is improved, people do not use their vehicle. As over time, utilization of fuel dwindle due to impact on aggregate of expense. For example, statistics show that one fifth of expense in big city relate to type of transportation. In order to demonstrate this, they contrast two huge cities, Tehran and Esfahan. In Tehran be developed more public transportation, while in Isfahan be improved more roads. In Tehran there are a lot of buses, trains, and subways, transporting a large number of citizens. Amazingly, a bus consumes only 42 liters fuel, transporting 30 persons, however a personal car consumes 200 liters, transporting 5 persons. If government improve more public transportation instead of roads and highways, expense will decrease significantly. As you can see, improving public transportation is beneficial for society.
Second, public transportation will decrease air pollution. One subway can transfer huge number of commuter who need to move much more than other people. If governments invest in public transportation and improve its quality, all people persuade use these vehicle. Therefore, by reducing fuel consumption, if fact, air pollution will be more healthy. For instance, once I live in Tehran in two decades ago, air was very polluted. Mayor's Ahvaz offered a lot of suggestion for this problem such as development of vegetation all over of city. this solution, however, was temporary and after only a few month they decided to develop public transportation. Early, people may have used their cars, but finally they convinced to use public transportation because of convenience of them. Surprisingly, this strategic for pollution air solve issue, decreasing pollution in a few weeks. This experience taught me that improving public transportation influence on our environment.
In conclusion, improving public transportation is better than improving roads and highways. Not only do expenses decrease dramatically, but also reduce air pollution appreciably. Government should try to solve problem of public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | wty980711 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Orwell1984 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | marysv | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- professors appearing on tv programs 3
- In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Us 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
... our time. Public transportation is one of best way for all the people. Some people say...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'expended'?
Suggestion: expended
...ve that public transportation should be expend more money by governments. In my view, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hile in Isfahan be improved more roads. In Tehran there are a lot of buses, trains...
^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...uses, trains, and subways, transporting a large number of citizens. Amazingly, a bus consumes onl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this vehicle' or 'these vehicles'?
Suggestion: this vehicle; these vehicles
...ve its quality, all people persuade use these vehicle. Therefore, by reducing fuel consumptio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...lopment of vegetation all over of city. this solution, however, was temporary and af...
^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun month seems to be countable; consider using: 'few months'.
Suggestion: few months
...however, was temporary and after only a few month they decided to develop public transpor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 8.0752688172 433% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56359102244 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30101286969 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531172069825 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4005390607 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.6785714286 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3214285714 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368823263105 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10099179524 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116544671561 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257949825188 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817846872576 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.