Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
The government decisions have very crucial effects on our life. The officials are responsible for education, defense, and even transportation. It has been reported that millions of dollars of tax revenues are invested in transportation systems alone. Some people believe that a huge amount of money should be spent on public transportation. Others feel investment on the roads and highways is more important. In my view, paying attention to improve streets and roads is more significant for a society for two important reasons.
The first reason that comes to my mind is that government should have a plan to decrease car accidents on the roads and highways. Nowadays, the majority of reported car accidents are because of the low quality of roads. For instance, there are a lot of pothole on our main street, w hich put drivers in a hazardous condition. Since drivers cannot observe them, especially if they drive above the speed limit, they might lose their control. Therefore, they have to break suddenly, which increases the probability of potential accidents. In addition, the street is very narrow so that the majority of cars have trouble with turning and changing direction on it. Reporters have been shown that the accident statistics are very high on this street due to the mentioned problems. As a result, the government should have an accurate plan for paving this street in the near future. This plan should be effective in such a way that reduces the transportation disasters. As you can see, improvement of roads and highways leads to reduce accidents.
The second significant reason is that investment for improving roads would assist the transportation services to operate well. Spending a huge investment on transportation systems while the conditions of roads and highways are poor is just waste of money. A prime example of my own experience may shed some light at this point. Let’s go back 10 years ago when my father was the mayor of Danville, a city located in Pennsylvania State. He invested a large amount of money on high-speed modern buses for the city. Even though the buses were highly fast, they had to consume a large amount of gas, which finally resulted in increasing carbon dioxide emission into the environment. If my father did spend money to construct new roads and build bridges, he would be able to shorten distances and prevent environmental pollution caused by long-distance driving, as well as increase citizens’ satisfaction. This example taught me investing money in renewing roads and highways might be more effective than transportation systems.
Taking into all of the aforementioned factors, spend money on the improvement of roads is not only reduce the car accidents but also assist to improve quality of both transportation systems and roads. The government should have very good management on tax revenue and the way of spending it
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | wty980711 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Orwell1984 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | marysv | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 60
- Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. 73
- hypothesis of using star for navigating in humpback whales. 75
- integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pothole seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of potholes'.
Suggestion: a lot of potholes
...ality of roads. For instance, there are a lot of pothole on our main street, w hich put drivers ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my own experience may shed some light at this point. Let's go back 10 years ...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... transportation systems. Taking into all of the aforementioned factors, spend money on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all of the aforementioned factors, spend money on the improvement of roads is not...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... improvement of roads is not only reduce the car accidents but also assist to imp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12025316456 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95405737657 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527426160338 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9288496152 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3461538462 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266939535589 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704259906075 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675012783679 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187081780231 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637872034084 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.