Should students be allowed to use smart devices in the classroom. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. (real test topic Sep 8th 2018)

Essay topics:

Should students be allowed to use smart devices in the classroom. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. (real test topic Sep 8th 2018)

When it comes to the topic of smart devices, various points of view tend to develop. Some people may hold the view that students should not be allowed to use smart devices in their classroom, while others oppose to this view. Personally, I totally agree with the former view, which will be discussed in the following essay.
Obviously, using smart devices is disadvantageous in classroom when it comes to study efficiency. The fact is that if students use these devices, they may not pay enough heed to the lectures in their classroom. As a consequence, they would miss much knowledge delivered by their teachers, which means later, they may show poor academic performance. My friend Jason is a compelling example of what I have mentioned above. In this academic year, his mother bought him the IPhone, the very smart gadget. However, possessing IPhone had negative impact on Jason’s learning efficiency. Recently, his head teacher reported his poor performance to his parents, and said that Jason used smart device too much without listening carefully to the lectures. As a result, he received many low grades in the recent examinations. What can be seen from this example is that as students use smart devices, they are likely to neglect their studies. Therefore, they should not be allowed to use these devices.
Some people may argue that students should be allowed to use smart devices during their class in terms of study efficiency. Specifically, they would utilize these devices as educational tools assisting them in studying. However, this is not entirely true. Though smart devices can support education, it can actually distract students from listening to lectures in their class as I have mentioned. Additionally, smarts devices cannot replace teachers’ role. Obviously, the knowledge delivered by teachers is enough for students, meaning that they do not have to use smart devices to search more information. Teachers are also capable of answering any questions from their students. Furthermore, the facilities or traditional study tools in the classroom can actually support students. Instead of using e-dictionary in smart devices, students may use traditional dictionary. Therefore, it can be asserted that the disadvantages of smart devices outweigh the advantages so students should not be allowed to use them in their classroom.
In conclusion, I am completely in agreement with the statement that students should not be allowed to use smart phones in their classroom. The primary reason is that students may neglect their studies. It is highly recommended that people should take my writing into careful consideration to have better sense of smart devices’ effect on students’ learning efficiency.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-15 Hoapham 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34180138568 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92319642022 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478060046189 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4884678224 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9615384615 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6538461538 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65384615385 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357573372609 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112356125949 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971577797111 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247204205146 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047765108049 0.0645574589148 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.