Society benefits more from works of great artists from political leaders.
Currently, people’s living standards have been greatly improved, thus there is an increasing number of individuals attaching more importance to the development of society. Some individuals reckon that artists play a vital role in the advancement of society, while others contend that political leaders are of dominant significance to enhance the development. Personally speaking, I suggest that political leaders play an irreplaceable role in society and there are a couple of reasons to account for my view.
To start with, political leaders are capable of implementing some policies to develop the economy. To be more specific, during the process of civilization, the economy is a solid foundation of the whole society. However, without the regulations enacted by the political leaders, the economy cannot develop based on its own strength. Therefore, with the involvement of the authority, the developing economy enables citizens to elevate their living standards in all round with progressively increasing incomes, for instance, they can make major purchases, buying imported commodities or traveling abroad to expand their outlook. What has been mentioned above cannot be achieved by artists, since their aptitude is geared toward the arts instead of the real living, hence they are not beneficial to the whole society’s advancement.
What’s more, political leaders are also key factors to lead all individuals to win the battle of protecting the environment. Nowadays, due to the excessive construction both in rural and urban areas, the environment, as our living foundation, is extremely contaminated and pose a threat to our living on earth. What confronted with us is that we ought to take firm measures to restrict factories to emit exhaust fumes or pour waste water into rivers, which exerts detrimental effects on individuals’ health by contaminating potable water and hurting our respiratory systems. All of these behaviors influencing the well-being of the environment can merely be governed by laws or regulations implemented by political leaders. In contrast, artists are not entitled to pass laws to regulate such socially unacceptable behaviors. Hence, what can artists do for the serious issues of environmental contamination? Although they can create some painting related with the environment or hold performances intertwined with achievement people have made in tackling environmental issues to raise the public awareness of environmental protection, it fails to address the real existing problems.
Admittedly, with the improvement of living qualities, more and more individuals are interested in artists and regard the arts as an integral component of their lives. It should be acknowledged that artists have its perks, like boosting people’s aptitude of appreciating masterpieces. Nevertheless, the arts are based on the foundation of the well-developed society. Provided that the society cannot satisfy individuals’ basic needs, the artists are not conducive to accommodate people’s desires due to the lack of strength in reality.
In a nutshell, from what has been discussed above, political leaders contribute more to the development of society due to their significant role in regulating the economy and environmental protection.
- If your friend wants to reduce living expenses, which would you suggest?1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.3. Shop for less expensive food and cooking at home 70
- government has done enough to educate people about the importance of healthy lifestyles 90
- It is better to spend money on traveling than save money for the future 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public. Others people prefer to wait until many people have used them. Which do you prefer? 90
- The more money people have the more money they should give away to charity 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2809.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7093495935 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32501626981 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538617886179 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 897.3 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9536504239 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.45 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182907160884 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558632989025 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047542959097 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11611113732 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049105843547 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 86.8835125448 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.