Some cities think that a way to limit pollution and congestion is to tax drivers heavily who drive into the city each day but who live elsewhere. What do you think about this policy? Do you support it? Why or why not? Use specific reasons.
I have a contrasting viewpoint regarding the statement that limiting pollution and congestion is to tax drivers heavily who are not from the city. There are the following reasons for my belief:
Firstly, Property prices in the city are sky high, and ordinary salaried people can't buy a house in the town, so, they purchase property in the countryside; also some people who don't like the city lifestyle and want to be close to nature also opted to live outside the city. These people do daily up down to their offices which is mainly in the downtown area. If we tax these people, then companies will see an increment in resigning rate of employees, as paying taxes will decrease the saving of the employees, and they will try to take a job near their houses.
Secondly, the countryside has only the necessary shops but for purchasing other items people have to come to the city, if the tax were imposed then people will not come frequently to the city and decrement in the market footfall will be observed which is not at good for either business owner or government. Also, the travelers who come to visit from another country usually rent cars to explore the places around, but due to imposed taxes, they will be motivated to skip that city, which results in less foreign currency reserve, which ultimately affects the country's GDP.
Suppose, if the business capital New York city imposes tax then the revenue of city ultimately decrease as property in the city is not affordable, primarily the New York income comes from business and the recessive footfall will impact business owners.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | daddycools | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | daddycools | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | daddycools | 70 | view |
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explor 88
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explor 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 60
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explor 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... sky high, and ordinary salaried people cant buy a house in the town, so, they purch...
^^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n the countryside; also some people who dont like the city lifestyle and want to be ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 274.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80291970803 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45756786918 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569343065693 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.6003584229 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.1344086022 194% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2778338786 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.0 100.406767564 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.1428571429 20.6045352989 190% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141901831187 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739481228085 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572499340986 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102143175368 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524066692617 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 11.7677419355 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.1575268817 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.0537634409 175% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.