Which is better, the blockbuster or the drama? That is that is a debate that utterly divides the world of films. Film making is an art which goal is to captivate audiencies and make people think. Even though some people think serious movies are boring, is of my conviction that they are more meaningful than plain, comercial movies. And I will explain my reasons for believing so in the following essay.
First, I find that though-provoking films beat movies designed to entertain in their own game. The former ones are unexpected, present complex arguments and characters, whereas blockbusters present an established formula. I am not engaged in predictable movies, for instance, in the new film, “The Predator” it was so obvious what the outcome was going to be from the beginning. It was no surprise that the whole theather was yawning by the end of the movie. I have never seen this with Cristopher Nolan’s movies, which are considered masterpieces.
Furthermore, they want to plasmate a real message. Film is an art, and as such I expect it to have a higher purpose than to merely amuse consumers, so movies that leave a deep message in you must be the ones considered important. As a personal example, “artificial intelligence” was a movie that let me thinking what it means to be human. Having a robot, as a protagonist, he develops true emotions for her ward, and he shows that his feelings are as strong as ours, so why should human emotions be called real and he’s not? This is a question that humanity must ask itself in the yearst to come, and this movie started people to do just that.
For all the reasons drawn above, I think that thoughtful movies are superior in quality than joyful ones. Moreover, The ability to surprise us and make us question our values are elements that, in my opinion show, a greater form of art.
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 76
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 73
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 88
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 65
- Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'That is'.
Suggestion: That is
...s better, the blockbuster or the drama? That is that is a debate that utterly divides the world...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. Moreover, The ability to surprise us and make us question our values are elem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83229813665 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90514629663 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593167701863 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4697121309 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201715810844 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602819747345 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618885500242 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11946649161 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417814848119 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.