Humans have always looked at the skies, looking for their place among the stars. Should we not try to reach them? Human curiosity is what drives progress and space exploration exceptionally fuels It. Therefore, I think that governments should use as many resources as they can to travel to other planets, and reaching them will be crucial for our future as a species, for the following reasons.
First, it is essential for humans to dream. Our inquisitive nature is the engine for development and indulging it have had revolutionary results in the past. Take as an example smartphones, they were a mere attempt to make computers fit into our pockets, but they ended up providing us instant access to knowledge and connecting us with our loved ones across the world, in fewer words they changed our lives. Think of what we can achieve if we put our brightest minds to work for exploring the cosmos.
Furthermore, we should look for other planets. Because Earth is in such a deteriorated state, it should be clear for us that we must find safety in another planet. Likewise, how long are we going to survive if we keep polluting this planet? Besides, if we want to be preserved as a species, we should think of how probable it is for a natural disaster to end all of the humankind. For instance, let us say that an asteroid collides with our planet, it could potentially end with our legacy forever. But if we were to become an interplanetary species, if all life gets erased from a planet, we could start again with colonies in another one.
For all the points drawn above, in my opinion, governments should heavily invest in space exploration. This would further extend our development, and It also would secure us a future as a species. Must of us have had fantasies of reaching the firmament, we should make it a reality.
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 61
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo 78
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 76
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 76
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...engine for development and indulging it have had revolutionary results in the past. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ble it is for a natural disaster to end all of the humankind. For instance, let us say tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, likewise, look, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71651090343 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71068855021 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563862928349 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3339677637 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240952503557 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091619127282 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622229372947 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158648278802 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384100170811 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.