Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
Smart phones are a powerful tools in today’s world. It can lead to several benefits for children and their studies and also in their well-being and safety. It has a few downsides and can be really dangerous in wrong hands, however overall a smart phone can be a magnific tool for young kids.
First of all, children are really vulnerable beings and parents must be aware of their location all the time. Smart phones have a GPS integrated on it, which allows parents to find the exactly location of the children when necessary. In addition to that, this GPS can also serve as a guide to children who are lost. Smart phones are set up with digital maps that can lead children to a certain destination avoiding children to get lost.
Moreover, smart phones are set up with apps that can improve children’s education and literacy. Nowadays, parents, children and educators have an extensive variety of mobile software that enables children to rapid gain more knowledge about certain subjects. Furthermore, it benefits kids who are having difficulties in certain areas, such as: math, chemistry, physics and biology, to name a few.
Smart phones are also able to perform basic functions, for instance: voice calls, video calls and recording audio and video. Recordings can be really useful for lectures and classes where the volume of work load is higher than usual. This videos or audios can be used later on for studying purposes or even to recapitulate some important facts mentioned in class.
In conclusion, smart phones can be an excellent children’s and parents ally if manage properly. Smart phones have children filters that can be switch on according to a specific age, so parents can have most of it without street out to much.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 71 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | Chayank_11 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 60 | view |
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 73
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 81
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 70
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 76
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...lume of work load is higher than usual. This videos or audios can be used later on f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... can have most of it without street out to much.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99659863946 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65970953151 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1943556289 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205317504419 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858668592484 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520371604135 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126861605571 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315834082066 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.