Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings. What type of old buildings are worth preserving? Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Every person has a confident attitude about historical places. In particular, old buildings are valued by some organizations, which have played an essential role in sustaining our history. Many people believe that this action is the majority of advantages for the next generation of people. This essay attends to discuss the factors of positive point of this matter.
In the first step, it should be considered that the only way of proving the history of every culture is by referring to some factors available in reality. The way of explanation, old building, is an essential document built by some famous people. Also, the value of old buildings based on the stories which have narrated by local people. For example, in Iran, a vast number of governmental people had a significant and expensive house with a massive security guard in the past to protect their homes. The big decision had been made in the critical meeting in this kind of house. More importantly, the rules adopted for keeping these areas can have a positive impact on society's context. For instance, every tourist annually travels to a historical place to better understand the culture of every country. One of the proved elements for understanding the past can be referred to as the old building.
Additionally, from an economic perspective, old buildings can be beneficial for the industrial tourist, which can help the country gain more advantages to fill the financial situation gap. The tourist attractions are a tremendous opportunity to invited many people to every country. In Europe, for instance, the majority of historical places are in southern European countries like Italy. The statistics from economics show that Italy's government earned at least 1 billion Euros from visiting foreigners of the old building. However, in the pandemic days, this industry under high pressure is crashed. And people prefer to stay and use digital media to visit historical places. In consequence, the old buildings can be counted as financial opportunities for the countries.
In conclusion, old buildings as the identity for people show us what happened in the past, and should be sustained strongly for the next generation. Furthermore, it should be focused on a financial opportunity to help the economic situation.
- Now children do not behavior as well as the children did in the past Which one of the following measure do you think can help children age 5 10 behave better A Control the time they spend on TV or movie B Take more time to chat with children C Monitor the 73
- Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school which way can bring them the most benefit 1 to accumulate work experience by a part time job or volunteering in a community 2 learning to play a sport 3 learning to play a musical instr 70
- Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings What type of old buildings are worth preserving Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages 85
- The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vocation programs Which one do you think is better for students 1 Take some college courses in advance e g some courses that are related to students major 2 Visit some 77
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92120306376 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531165311653 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3529290504 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7142857143 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179887022724 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540416247821 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609926248288 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122674283304 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112533767912 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.