Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed(damaged) by human activity. Others that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recently there has been a ton of debates on whether human activity has detrimental effects on earth. Personally, I am of the opinion that human activities indeed have damaged the earth. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in this essay.
First of all, pollution which is resulted from human activities have harmed the earth severely. There are different kinds of pollution, such as air pollution, plastic pollution and water pollution, etc., which has not only hurt the earth but also lead to tremendous damage to our health. For example, research has clearly shown that air pollution which is caused mainly by gas released from vehicles, including carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and nitric oxide, has warmed the earth and caused extreme climate change, consequently leading to increased sea level and natural disaster such as tsunami and Hurricanes, which represents typical results from disturbed climate. This evidently demonstrates that human activity has damaged the earth.
Secondly, deforestation also have destroyed the ecosystems on earth. Clearing and cutting down trees has put a large number of animals in danger because of lacking dwelling places, and reduced suitable land for human beings as well because of desertification. This is best demonstrated by a research conducted by Peking University. Results from this study shows that the area of desert in China has increase by 10 percent in the last few decades, and tens of thousands of animals have been forced to leave their dwellings. As we can see, human activities have brought about tremendous damage to the earth.
In conclusion, I am fully convinced that human activities have put the earth including themselves in danger. This is because human nowadays has polluted almost every non-renewable resource on earth, and because deforestation has damaged plenty of dwelling places for both human and animals.
- Like many creatures humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling In the case of humpback whales we may have found the answer they may be navigating by the stars much 90
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 90
- Like many creatures humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling In the case of humpback whales we may have found the answer they may be navigating by the stars much 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...Clearing and cutting down trees has put a large number of animals in danger because of lacking dw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31456953642 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75565333081 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.6968838568 48.9658058833 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263333713532 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125169490686 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10486949379 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188473998193 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460872522452 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.