Some people believe that the media (for example: television, radio, newspapers, or Internet news sources) are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past. These people argue that the media today often present incorrect information about news stories and that this causes problems for the public
With the advent of the state-of-the-art technology and invention of novel mass media such as television, radio, newspaper, and so forth many aspects of human life has been undergone noticeable changes. Certainly, there are some benefits which can be enumerates for the revolutionary change, but a plethora of people believe that these media are not concerned about the information they provide in recent years compared to the past. However, others hold the opposite perspectives. I, to a great extent, corroborate that different mass media present incorrect and unreal information for some reasons. The most conspicuous ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, there is an immense and high competition among diversed channels and media to attract people's attention. In fact, different companies, organizations, and governments owning these media make attempt to absorb more viewers since they can make profit from a large number of individuals who watch or listen to their media. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, possessing more audiences, owners are able to show more advertisements or take the control of that community. But is the past, there were a few media which were mostly governed for the sake of entertainments. To shed more light on this issue, consider some news channels controlled by some authorities and governments' leaders. Through these popular and well-known news stations they can have a great impact on their listeners, and as a result, they will have more power to influence different parts of society. Briefly, the more audiences, the further influence on human beings.
The second exquisite point to be mentioned is that thanks to the development of modern technology, a wide variety of mass media are presented in comparison to the past. As a result, it is much more cumbersome to testify the contents provided by different individuals. Therefore, numerous managers, especially those who take advantage from spreading fake news and data, are not worry about the accurateness. For a tangable example, it is prevalent in many channels which show commercial advertisements that new drugs or herbs are discovered by which over-weight people are able to reduce their extra fat, no matter how old they are, is fewer than one month. Unfortunately, research indicates that a large percentage of these ads are incorrect, and the worse, they have a lot of side effects and bring about numerous diseases. Hence, such companies utilize these media to sell their products.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that nowadays the media is not concerned about giving accurate facts to audience due to some reasons. Not only is it complicate to supervise various media, but also many individuals take advantage from this situation.
- teachers have a higher effect on students rather than their friends 76
- We should be honest with our friend 90
- advantages of the clouding seeding schemes 80
- it is always more important to have a good social relations background rather than studying hard in school 90
- reduce their expense by some approaches 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...viewers since they can make profit from a large number of individuals who watch or listen to thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, in fact, such as, as a result, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30648769575 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02012428534 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557046979866 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3975841681 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.35 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320491887459 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801751679821 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658130058094 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186020377028 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433975395411 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.