Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. Which view do you agree with, and why?
There are some moot points about whether parents should pay some money to children for doing some task in the home or not. The question of this issue has aroused as a subject of controversy among people. Everyone has his or her zeitgeist. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that parents should pay some money for doing some jobs around the house. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be expounded in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that nowadays due to the tough economic situation, people work hard to make more money, therefore, money has great value. If children realize the value of money, they will be live easily in the future. Parents can instruct this momentous issue to the children and the best way for that is paying some money for doing any task in the home. As a case to the point I vividly remember when I was a child, my father gave me some money owing to doing some jobs in our home. The corollary of this action leads to I know the precious of the money and expense that in the right way. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that parents can learn something very beneficial to children with paying some money to them.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that parents can persuade kids to save a small amount of money which they take that due to working in the house. This saved money will be very lucrative for them in the future. My personal example demonstrates this reality, when I got the currency which paid in respect to my jobs in the home, I deposited that in the bank account. Thus, when I got an admission from the best university in our country, I had enough money for studying at that university. This saved money was very beneficial for me and helped me to afford my tuition fees. My personal experience shed some light to the point that children can save this kind of money and expense that in the sensitive conditions.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reason, I reiterate that paying a small amount of money to juveniles in respect to doing some tasks in the house have great aftermath. This action not only ameliorates the value of money in the children vision but also can be saved in the bank account and use in crucial situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | najisa | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | persepolistmm | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | mahi22 | 63 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | 30vil | 68 | view |
| 2018-08-22 | negar_nouri123 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it's better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a sense of humor? 73
- Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations? 70
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child(5-10 years old)? 1.being helpful2.Being honest3.Being well organized 73
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree 73
- TPO 41. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, kind of, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54566744731 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44587320606 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456674473068 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9397232749 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.157894737 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271594161618 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911241901855 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876212176097 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192070238723 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733670373168 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.