In the modern era, parents are regarded as crucial factors contributing to the development of various facets of children's characteristics. However, because of their excessive amount of work, they might not have much time to spend with their beloved kids. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the questions of how to make use of this time, and what to do to increase its quality. Many people adhere to the view that playing with kids increases the emotional bonds between family members, while others believe that helping teenagers with their homework is a more pivotal task. I firmly believe assisting kids in their studies is more crucial. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that children do not need their parents to play with them. Most of the contemporary games are tightly entangled with technology and electronic devices, while parents do not have adequate knowledge to use them. Also, these games contain sophisticated logic which can not be learnt in a short time. As a result, youngsters will be bored defeating their elders all the time. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was ten, I had a PlayStation device. I played with it all the time, so I considered myself a professional in all the games that I had. When I asked my mother to play with me, she became confused by all those buttons and kept asking me about the use of each of them. After a while, I became mad at her; thus, I preferred to play alone.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that kids have plenty of troubles with their studies which can be solved within this time. Parents already have that rudimentary knowledge or even utilize more advanced topics in their professions. So, answering to those fundamental questions would be simple for them, also has vital impacts on their children's' illiteracy process. For instance, when I was thirteen, I was bombarded with mathematical and physics problems. My father, who is a computer engineer, noticed my sadness, and because he was acquainted with those subjects, he aided me to solve a considerable portion of them. Thus, I got the top mark of the class in those courses.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that spending time with adolescents on the homework is more beneficial than playing games with them. This is because their games are too complex for adults to learn in a short period, plus they can help their child to progress in his/her studies.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do yo agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 3
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88261851016 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74177079541 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537246049661 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5231386211 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0434782609 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2608695652 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317061707068 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856783450343 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061909783588 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196274989777 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663942757129 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.