Some people believed that the earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity make the earth a better place to live. What is your opinion?
Most of people think earth get in risk by human activity and new discoveries. In my point of view, earth will destroy soon, if we do not revise our attitude to use natural resources. This essay will discuss about humans activity and mention some specific reasons to support my idea.
First of all, global warming is the most significant issue that has brought via human activity and attracted every one’s attention. The major reason of global warming is extracting of natural fossil sources (oil, gas, and coal) and use them in their daily activity such as fuel for their automobile and factory, to heat their houses, produce clothes and as a raw material for other products. The emission which get out of cars’ exhaust make the air polluted and because of the some greenhouse gases which produced by factories, heat trapped in the atmosphere and caused the earth to become warm. In addition, increasing earth temperature leads to melting pole ice and destroying tropical forest which leads to drastic catastrophic for human kind. Since by melting poles ice, sea level will goes up and most of people who live in the coast line will be die.
Furthermore, risk of different new disease treat human lives. New diseases are generated via scientist new research about disease and manipulating gens. For instance, some of the most dangerous disease of recent century such as AIDS, Gala, Bala Bola, and Zeeka were created by military research that killed millions people around the world and spread so fast. According to the new statistic which published by disease control organization (DCO) in 2015, 85 percent of people believe governments and scientists activity generate these to kill people and sometimes attack to other countries.
In conclusion, personally I believe human activity damage earth and put his life in danger. I declared some reasons like global warming, air pollution and disease to support my idea.
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, house, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. DO you agree or disagree with this point of view? 71
- What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? 90
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think it is good idea? 76
- Some people prefer to work for large company. Others prefer to work for small company. Which would you prefer? 70
- Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day's work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late night at night. Which one do you prefer? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
Most of people think earth get in risk by human activi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ake the air polluted and because of the some greenhouse gases which produced by fact...
^^^^
Line 2, column 798, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...ce by melting poles ice, sea level will goes up and most of people who live in the c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 810, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...g poles ice, sea level will goes up and most of people who live in the coast line will be die....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07886435331 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56159966292 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7612003616 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261237341876 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946376198644 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739120872166 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1682985573 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466133023317 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.