Nowadays, young generations have more technology and innovative products and services at their hands to make their lives easier. Nevertheless, at the same time, they face harder challenges than older groups to keep up with fast changing economies, markets and societies in general.
30 years ago, the baby booming generation, would have never imagine the impact of the internet in our lives. We now have all the information that we need with just one click. Advanced technology has made life more comfortable by providing the best medical treatments, free education, communication solutions, thousands of gadgets to simplify our daily tasks and all sorts of products at our doors. Something that in the late 80's we wouldn't have think of. But, does this means Millennials and x generations have less pressure than their parents?
As everything in life, greater achievements come with greater problems. Which means we can only expect more stress and urgency to get things done, to be efficient, to improve what we have already achieved, and to take high tech to the extreme. Children feel the demand to be better in every aspect of their lives. Since we have now more access to data, we are very informed and we tend to judge more how decisions are made. This tendencies combined with a highly competitive market of products, services and human capital, push kids to the point of breakdown. While we can enjoy better life quality with all these science improvements, we are also more prone to mental health issues derived from the same situation.
In my opinion, even though young adults have all the things that they need, they have to confront with bigger risks than their older generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'imagined'.
Suggestion: imagined
...by booming generation, would have never imagine the impact of the internet in our lives...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...oors. Something that in the late 80s we wouldnt have think of. But, does this means Mil...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...ng that in the late 80s we wouldnt have think of. But, does this means Millennials an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...d to judge more how decisions are made. This tendencies combined with a highly compe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, while, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 282.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03191489362 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62487290142 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9154613593 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.357142857 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172861858747 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627856641686 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525015628707 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126211960264 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441627660385 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.