Some people prefer to give their opinions immediately. Others prefer to wait and listen to others’ opinions before giving their own. Which one do you think is better?
In my opinion, waiting and listening to others’ opinions before giving my opinion would be a better idea because you will make fewer mistakes by listening to others first. Moreover, you can learn new things by thinking about somethings that others state. I will illustrate my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, you will make fewer mistakes by listening to others first, for you can listen to others' opinions and think about them carefully. Furthermore, during others are talking about their opinions, you have more time to think about your opinion and develop it. As a result, your idea will be more precise. For example, when I was a student, I used to answer any question immediately. Sometimes, I was in a hurry to answer the question before anyone else without enough thinking which led me to misinterpretation. Thereby, my answers were completely wrong. Thus, some of these huge mistakes affected my credit among teachers and other students. On the contrary, one of my friends always waited and talked about his opinion at the end. He listened to others' opinions precisely; in the meanwhile, he had time to think about his opinion for developing it. Thereby, he has always received the teachers’ approval.
Second, waiting and listening to others first helps you to seem politer. Thus, you would have better social relationships, due to everybody likes to communicate with persons who respect them. As a result, you would make a lot of links with people who could help you whenever you need it. For example, I have a friend who never answers a question before others. He always waits until others state their opinions and then if he has a different opinion he says his opinion. Indeed, this respectful act helps him to seem polite. Consequently, people like him and tend to have a friend like him. Thereby, he has a lot of friends who are ready to help him if he needs it.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that waiting and listening to others’ opinions would be a better idea.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important characteristic to a successful politician or leader is good communication skills. 70
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 70
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants Other countries have no intention of doing this Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on 73
- TPO 44 78
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, thus, while, for example, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92463768116 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77573728878 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8001234777 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2272727273 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6818181818 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372450926385 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101275302895 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100479769796 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248794701844 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627006866126 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.