Some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions where there are many people. Others like the ones with fewer people. Which one do you prefer?
Visiting tourist attractions is one of the most interesting experiences everyone can get during life. People depending on their personalities and opinions choose different touristic places. Some people think they should avoid going to places which are crowded with tourists. However, others, standing on the other side of the continuum, believe that it would be better to visit somewhere that has many visitors. I, personally, concur with the first group for two main reasons that I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in a crowded place the possibility of encountering some threatening factors such as criminals or even some viral diseases is higher than the places containing fewer people. When a large population gathers together in a crowded place it is highly probable that they lose their money, possessions, and even children by rubbers and criminals, the ones who are waiting for a good opportunity to abuse others. To be more specific in such a circumstance people have less control over their belongings, as a result, they will be hurt. Moreover, when people come from a different country and gather in a given place, they bring all viruses and harmful diseases with themselves. Take the Covid-19 as an example. The rate of the prevalence in places with many people was drastically more than in places with few populations.
Another equal reason is that people who go to visit a certain tourist place have a penchant to meet all the aspects of the place, and want to hear the explanation which the tour leader offers which these would not be possible in association with many people. When there are a lot of people around a tourist spot it is difficult to enjoy spending time there and getting acquainted with characteristics of such places because plenty of people are waiting to visit that where. Moreover, people are talking and making noise which prevents the ones who want to listen to the information that the tour leader provides. A personal example can drive this notion home. When my friends and I went to a crowded museum, we all wanted to know about the history of a kind of handy craft. Nonetheless, none of us could find the information because of the distraction that other tourists made.
In conclusion, taking two mentioned reasons into account, I do believe that people should attend tourist attractions with few people. In this way, not only do people stay protected from some hazardous factors such as criminals and viral diseases, but they also have a chance to get familiar with the place they visit without any disturbance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-06 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | saamaan | 83 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | Maedeee | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 80
- Broccoli is grown in West of America 73
- Which one can make friendship stronger Having a good time with your friend Enjoy good time Solving your problem with him or her talk about problem Supporting each other 73
- bb 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, even so, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99076212471 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71053531443 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528868360277 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7999095482 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.736842105 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7894736842 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35302839534 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106872360846 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741242955037 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236802026794 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053633058908 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.