There is no doubt that people are in a dilemma to decide their home and future in small city or big cities and this decision plays a crucial role in our lives. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in small city in my entire life for some reasons which will be explored below.
First, I am inclined to belive that I always find small cities have conveniont enviorenment to have a happy and safely family life. Nevertheless, small city has limited opportunity for entertainment, health care, roaming and etc. We have a chance to gain more leusire times to spend. For example, I used to live in Istanbul where is most crowded city and we usually spend 3 or 4 hours in traffic. This confined us to develop our hobbies and skills. At the same time, my friends learnt languages but I could not because of the wasted time.
Second, our world became more dangerous than yesterday. I looked back and I used to walk alone in entire city when I was 5. Nowadays, I never let my son to go to the grossary alone. Living in the small city provide more safety places to us. We know our entire neighborhood, few visiters come to provience and these all factors make small city more reliable rather than big city.
On the other hand, In my view, living in the big city brings lots of dangers such as, kidnappig, burgary, murder and more. However, some of the people who has enough money to afford safe and luxury places in the large city have an opportunity to dwell in peace and secure. For example, as we all know, syria is in the war and we all think all of the syrian people inhabit dangerous life conditions. However, rich syrian people make fun of pool party in south of syria
To sum up, I cannot deny that we can do lots of thing in large city and never get bored in compared to small city. In my opinion, being safe and in the nature is much more significant for my life. If I come this life, I definetly live in small city.
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 65
- Integrated essay. ETS OFFICIAL TOEFL iBT TEST-4 3
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Do you agree or disagree? 66
- People learn better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers-than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...for entertainment, health care, roaming and etc. We have a chance to gain more leusire t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...pig, burgary, murder and more. However, some of the people who has enough money to afford s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...w, syria is in the war and we all think all of the syrian people inhabit dangerous life co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...To sum up, I cannot deny that we can do lots of thing in large city and never get bored in co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, well, for example, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31318681319 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32604554207 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546703296703 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5729738248 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6315789474 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166745789427 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582725671186 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653365295556 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106713551403 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341003649739 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 10.9000537634 71% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.