Together with the improvements in society, it seems rather ironic that choosing where to live became the hardest decision people had to make. Thus, the question has been raised as to whether living in a rural area or urban area is better. While it is undeniable that both arguments have their own merits to boast; if forced to choose one over another, my resolute standpoint is definitely in line with living in a big city and I will explain the reasons in the following essay.
To begin with, living in a huge city allows me to have access to everything I want. To be more specific, it makes my life comfortable and gives me the flexibility of the time because everything is available instantly and productively. I assume that a personal example can shed light on this notion. A couple of years ago when I was living in the capital city of South Korea, Seoul, I usually went to the shopping mall adjacent to my house to buy some house products. This allowed me to buy the stuff I want to buy in diversity. Whereas, in the village, I have to drive more than 1 hour to reach the shopping mall which made my commuting time to work to be delayed. Should I live in a modern place, I can quickly buy the products I want to purchase without wasting my time. It is clear with this example that why I choose to live in a metropolis.
Moreover, I can meet different people from all over the world and broaden my social network. In other words, due to the increase in tourism in a city nowadays, myriad of people from various cultures and ethnicities visit the city which I can build my socializing skills while working. Also, a survey conducted by the University of Harvard shows that about 85% of people living in a city are extrovert while in a small town only less than 30% are outgoing persons. Furthermore, an unknown scientist has said that when you have lack of friends, it can have repercussions on your mental health such as depression. This clearly shows why living in a huge town is better for me.
All in all, I strongly believe that residing in an urban area has a variety of advantages like the reasons mentioned above. Therefore, nothing in my mind cast doubt on my stance regarding the given statement.
- Imagine you could improve the town where you live by changing one important thing about it Which of the following would you choose to do Build additional parks Construct more libraries Improve public transportation 88
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge e 83
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 89
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both the views and give your opinion 71
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ake. Thus, the question has been raised as to whether living in a rural area or urban area is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, as to, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51990049751 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58413654613 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1507193221 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.944444444 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21261968768 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644729988293 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049029254079 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117468305769 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625322820315 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.