People have different thoughts and ideas regarding whether financial management for children is crucial at an early age. Certainly, some people if asked would disagree that children should not learn to manage money at a young age. I firmly believe that children need to learn how to manage their money. My views can be greatly substantiated by the reasons addressed below.
Firstly, it is important to consider that children can learn to save and spend their money in the future. Indeed, people tend to face difficulties paying rent, bills, or tuition fees. However, in most cases, learning how to manage their money at a young age can be beneficial when paying a monthly fee. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. For example, since high school when I was doing part-time jobs, I started to save my money for 4 months. Consequently, I was able to pay for the tuition fee for my English class. in this regard, the management of money can be beneficial in the future.
Second of all, students can learn the value of money. it would be fair to say that young people who did not learn how to manage their money do not save much money. On the other hand, a student who knows how to utilize their money is financially stable after being an adult. Take the case of Alex, a friend of mine who save his money every day since his teenage years, he now plans to buy his own house with the money he kept from an early age. In this respect, money management at an early age can be imperative for the comfy of oneself.
All in one, everyone may hold different views on the issue. Yet, I support the perspective that youngsters should learn to manage money at their age.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should allow children to make mistakes and let them learn from their own mistakes 88
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months. 84
- Some people say that children no longer need to develop handwriting skills, others believe that handwriting is still important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 66
- Some organization believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...r the tuition fee for my English class. in this regard, the management of money ca...
^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... students can learn the value of money. it would be fair to say that young people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, for example, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59271523179 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45533094698 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519867549669 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0559955961 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0555555556 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288693941896 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106439160907 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904991100037 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205879336221 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567918993316 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...r the tuition fee for my English class. in this regard, the management of money ca...
^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... students can learn the value of money. it would be fair to say that young people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, for example, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59271523179 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45533094698 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519867549669 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0559955961 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0555555556 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288693941896 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106439160907 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904991100037 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205879336221 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567918993316 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.