Some people prefer to work for large company, other prefer to work for small company. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.
Some people show special interest in working for large company, while others are more willing to work for small ones. In my point of view, my choice is definitely to work for big company instead of working in small ones.
Firstly, being a part of large, well known organization will provide me with a good opportunity to obtain knowledge from experts in there. For example, friend of mine is software developer in the Google known as the best innovative corporate. Before he started working in Google, he has worked several start-ups for a while. During that time, he was not able to solve some complex tasks such as designing databases, calculating algorithmic issues and et cetera. Due to in start-ups that he spent months there was not even single well-experienced, experts in that field. This reason goes to show that working in large company has advantage to acquire knowledge from good community.
Secondly, working in large organization will give you some understanding of corporate culture. For instance, the Facebook information technology company that ranked No.1 on Glassdoor’s 2018 best place to work list. The corporate culture at Facebook is sort of encouraging employees and support them to fulfill their satisfaction from their job. Facebook has truly surpassed all tech companies in terms of culture, perks, and employee lifestyle. Once Facebook’s data scientist said “Every morning when I go in, if feel like the luckiest guy on earth forever landing job here”. Moreover, CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg encourages everyone in Facebook to make bold decision, even if that means being wrong some of time. Consequently, employees in there would be able to do their job without worries. This is kind of culture that I would not experience in most of small organization.
In conclusion, I believe people should choose to work in large corporates instead of choosing small ones. It will create opportunities that you can develop yourself rapidly by learning things from experts. Furthermore, it helps to learn culture, employee lifestyle of big ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-09 | SammyQWERTY | 76 | view |
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 76
- What is your approach to problem-solving and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your response. 60
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 52
- Some people prefer to work for large company, other prefer to work for small company. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2447761194 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95464490032 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605970149254 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7988792311 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4736842105 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237082279296 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714540900027 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920063100109 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158345208087 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106841854354 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.