Some people prefer to work for a large company. Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer?
Throughout the humankind’s history, people make attempts to perform work to make money, supplying needs, such as foods, accommodation, clothes and so forth. Nowadays, people are working in various companies to earn money. A controversial question raises in this issue that which company is better for employees? Some people prefer to work for a large company has more job opportunities. On the contrary, some people prefer to work for a small company has a friendly atmosphere. In my opinion. I firmly subscribe the first notion and explain my reasons hereunder.
First and foremost, during his or her life, everyone wants to have a suitable social position in his or her community. Actually, that everyone’s desire is fulfilled requires an appropriate context to flourish their abilities, hence a large company, which have the wide range of job position, provide people and their abilities corresponded with these opportunities. Additionally, a person working in a large company who makes high efforts to reach the best career position. On the other hand, in a small company, many of job positions are divided into boss’s relationship rather than into people who are qualified their abilities by right standards. As a result, an employee should work for a large company because there has a lot of chances, job opportunities, to satisfy one’s wish.
Secondly, nowadays, the most people are trying to invest their energy, money, and attempts in a context which has the much better chance of getting more benefits. The People working for a large company have a chance to reach more profit from this situation. As the popularity of a large company makes more sale products than a small company, the people working for a large company might earn some profits from the prosperity of their company. As statistically economic standpoint of Asian countries shows that people working in a large company a higher income than a small company. Most of the small companies, which try to survive when competing with large companies, must pay their employees the least wage to supply their expense. Thus, the large company can support their employees with substantial revenue to compensate the low income of workers to provide better lives for them.
In summary, people working in a small company are much happier because of a friendly atmosphere, but they are deprived of not only reaching the best career position which is their wish, but also having a higher income than people working for a large company. Who can ignore all benefits and work for a small company?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | mukesh7541 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | Anshuliv | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | tamimadnan6240 | 83 | view |
| 2019-03-04 | mkme | 65 | view |
| 2018-04-04 | Nadiyahemati | 60 | view |
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily. 66
- What are important qualities of a good supervisor(boss)? Why these qualities are important. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 73
- Dancing plays an important role in a culture. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s from the prosperity of their company. As statistically economic standpoint of As...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in summary, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1380952381 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83685255632 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47380952381 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0471129538 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405730556904 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145083442812 0.076458572812 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126571249882 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277130814479 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689187575572 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.