It is hard to deny that with the popularity of the internet, more young people are affected by harmful information online, which leads impressionable people to generate the idea that the internet, providing access to much information, causes a series of problems. However, such a statement suffers from logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as globalization, education, and independence are concerned, I firmly hold that the advantages of the internet overweight its disadvantages, and people can learn a lot from internet information.
First and foremost, information on the internet helps people follow globalization steps, as they can search online for information about current worldwide affairs and politics to meet demands in globalization's background. Meanwhile, people can open their eyes and see things from a refreshed perspective instead of solidifying thinking when people can get information from different sources on the internet. Not to mention that learning about different parts of the world is an exciting way to challenge thought processes and expand the way to process information, and people will find that their propensity to keep learning from global information online helps them grow their mental capacities.
Furthermore, the fact that a lot of educational information can be found easily on the internet indicates the value and importance of the internet. Take the case of children lives in villages in poverty-stricken mountain areas in Guangdong Province, who could not continue their education simply because they cannot afford it. Fortunately, nowadays, most of them can have online courses for free or a small charge to get further education with the internet's help. Moreover, after online education, these children are more likely to find a better job than their parents and grandparents. Had it not been for internet support, there would have been more poor children who lost the chance to study more, improve themselves, then change their fate.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that online trash information is too easy to receive, polluting people's minds and misleading their behaviors. Ironically, existing harmful information on the internet does not mean people need to keep all online information away but offer them opportunities to learn how to distinguish truth and false independently. Independent judgment for varied information is an ability that benefits during a lifelong time. Therefore, people should take a scrupulous attitude to standardize it depending on their consideration because of uneven information and learn from them.
In a nutshell, I maintain that people can adequately utilize the internet to equip themselves with valuable knowledge. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from Penelope Fitzgerald goes, it is interesting to note everyone has a different take on the world, a different opinion, and given the same inputs have completely different outputs, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 82
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum or P ramorum was first detected in the forests of the western United States P ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees in many infected oaks leaves wither rapidly la 85
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp fishing boats When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe and they die 80
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 90
- TPO 36 integrated writing 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2601.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53404255319 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10712975576 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56170212766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 816.3 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8329063918 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255880622905 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846758049307 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709645565708 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149280661139 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521339644964 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2601.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53404255319 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10712975576 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56170212766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 816.3 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8329063918 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255880622905 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846758049307 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709645565708 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149280661139 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521339644964 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.