It is a point of debate about whether or not to give money to beggars. Personally, I feel that it is not a good idea to give money to beggars. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore through the following essay.
First, I believe that every person should try to find work and earn money. with respect. This, I feel, is very important for the upliftment of that person as by earning through working will make sure that he will get his wages uniformly and would not have to think of begging. The fundamental issue with begging is that it doesn't guarantee the person any money. A beggar may not get any money for most of the days. This is the reason I do not promote begging by giving money to a beggar.
Secondly, the problem with begging can be much more intense than it looks. A person who has resorted himself to begging doesn't have any moral values left in him/her. And, if he doesn't get what should be enough for him to feed himself and his dependents, he might try to indulge into shortcut ways of earning money quickly by getting into unethical ways like stealing, violence etc. which again is harmful for the society. This is another reason why begging should not be promoted indirectly by giving money to the beggars.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that we should not give money to the beggars. Instead, we should try to talk to them and persuade them to get some work and earn money. The government can also play big role here by creating more employment opportunities through which uneducated and unskilled people can find work easily and earn money respectfully.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 58
- School Organization 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than their friends. 83
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism 3
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most c 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
It is a point of debate about whether or not to give money to beggars. Personally, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...should try to find work and earn money. with respect. This, I feel, is very importan...
^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ndamental issue with begging is that it doesnt guarantee the person any money. A begga...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...son who has resorted himself to begging doesnt have any moral values left in him/her. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...oral values left in him/her. And, if he doesnt get what should be enough for him to fe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57491289199 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40458008103 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508710801394 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4084667134 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0625 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225019921553 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083995295353 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611366296421 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143701087473 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390283442273 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.